Who Owns The Weather? CHARTER of the Interagency Council for Advancing Meteorological Services (ICAMS); The Federal Weather Enterprise: Fiscal Year 2021 Budget and Coordination Report; WHITEHOUSE FY 2022 Research & Development Budget

August 17, 2020 | Official Designation | Interagency Council for Advancing Meteorological Services (ICAMS) Charter |

“ICAMS is the formal mechanism by which all relevant Federal departments and agencies (D’s/A’s) coordinate implementation of policy and practices to ensure U.S. global leadership in the meteorological services2 enterprise.”

Link To Full_Signed-ICAMS-Charter


“This Charter expires on 30 September 2030. ICAMS may vote on extending, terminating or modifying the Charter prior to the expiration date.”


Link To Full_Signed-ICAMS-Charter






The Committee continues to support the Department’s funding for colleges and universities to examine and evaluate earth system models and validate their ability to reproduce earth systems. The Committee is aware of limitations in the ability to understand and predict earth systems behavior posed by uncertainties in interactions between clouds, aerosols, and climate, an area of research highlighted as a priority by the National Climate Assessment with implications for weather prediction, infrastructure planning, and national security.”



“..Reducing uncertainty in understanding cloud aerosol effects requires investment in new techniques such as controlled experiments along with observational studies, modeling and computing. The Committee recommends $15,000,000 for cloud-aerosol research, technology innovation and computing..”

-Page 115

Link To Full_Document_CRPT-116srpt102





August 14, 2020  FY2022 Budget

Executive Office of the President Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies 

Whitehouse FY 2022 R&D Budget  Link

“Earth System Predictability and Meteorological Services: The United States aspires to lead the world in meteorological services via an Earth system approach that encompasses weather, climate, hydrologic, ocean, and related environmental topics–   …”





NOVEMBER 1960: “The technological Basis for the Reexamination of the Feasibility of Climate Control”

“Technological developments of the past two decades have provided the understanding, the techniques, and the means necessary for an assault on the problems of climate control. Control of any kind requires capabilities in all these areas. Meteorology is just now beginning to acquire such capabilities.”  -P.5   Link

“The Need For A Climate Control Study Program”






The Federal Weather Enterprise FY 2021  Link

The Federal Weather Enterprise: Fiscal Year 2021 Budget and Coordination Report


The Federal Weather Enterprise is located in Silver Spring, Maryland Link


June 2019 |  Federal Weather Enterprise 2020:

“Exercise leadership in coordinating U.S. efforts in international weather research priorities including the current World Meteorological Organization Grand Challenges.”  p4   

Link To Full_The Grand Challenges, by Hwirin Kim-2




A Global Weather Enterprise (GWE) Seminar, organised by the World Bank Group in collaboration with the [UN] World Meteorological Organization… 

Re: The Global Weather Enterprise



The Future of the Global Weather Enterprise

“The enterprise includes the full value chain of scientific research, observations of the Earth system, numerical models encoding the laws of physics applied to the system, supercomputing to integrate the models and observations, weather and hydrological forecasts from hours to weeks and potentially months ahead, and business-specific products and services enabling economic benefit and jobs to be created.”   Link

Link To Full_Document_The Future of the Global Weather Enterprise: Opportunities and Risks





October 31, 2005 – U.S. Military Wants to Own the Weather

“..Thunderbolts on demand – What would a military strategist gain in having an “on-switch” to the weather?”

U.S. Military Wants to Own the Weather


“Clearly, it offers the ability to degrade the effectiveness of enemy forces. That could come from flooding an opponent’s encampment or airfield to generating downright downpours that disrupt enemy troop comfort levels. On the flipside, sparking a drought that cuts off fresh water can stir up morale problems for warfighting foes.

Even fooling around with fog and clouds can deny or create concealment – whichever weather manipulation does the needed job.

In this regard, nanotechnology could be utilized to create clouds of tiny smart particles. Atmospherically buoyant, these ultra-small computer particles could navigate themselves to block optical sensors. Alternatively, they might be used to provide an atmospheric electrical potential difference — a way to precisely aim and time lightning strikes over the enemy’s head – thereby concoct thunderbolts on demand..”






July 1968 |  How to Wreck the Environment

Unless Peace Comes | a Scientific Forecast of New Weapons

“Among future means of obtaining national objectives by force, one possibility hinges on man’s ability to control and manipulate the environment of his planet. When achieved, this power over his environment will provide man with a new force capable of doing great and indiscriminate damage. Our present primitive understanding of deliberate environmental change makes it difficult to imagine a world in which geophysical warfare is practised. Such a world might be one in which nuclear weapons were effectively banned and the weapons of mass destruction were those of environmental catastrophe.

Alternatively, I can envisage a world of nuclear stability resulting from parity in such weapons, rendered unstable by the development by one nation of an advanced technology capable of modifying the Earth’s environment. Or geophysical weapons may be part of each nation’s armoury. As I will argue, these weapons are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars.”







October 2018 |  J. Marvin Herndon and Mark Whiteside |  Journal of Geography, Environment, and Earth Science International |


“In this Review, we aim to reveal an unrecognised source of causality leading to increases in combustibility, intensity, and the extent of California, United States of America wildfires, and the concomitant harm to human and environmental health. We review literature, including scientific and medical, and evidence, including photographic, of near-daily, near-global jet-spraying particulates in the atmosphere as related to wildfires. We review the evidence that atmospheric manipulation utilising aerosolised coal fly ash is a primary factor in the extent and severity of forest fires in California and elsewhere; adverse effects include exacerbation of drought, tree and vegetation die-off and desiccation, and unnaturally heating the atmosphere and surface regions of Earth. Forest combustibility is increased by moisture-absorbing aerosolised particles that damage the waxy coatings of leaves and needles, reducing their tolerance to drought. The aerial climate manipulation using coal fly ash greatly increases the potential for forest fire ignition by lightening. Wildfires dramatically worsen baseline air pollution, emitting harmful gases and volatile organic compounds, and they both concentrate and re-emit toxic elements and radioactive nuclides over a wide area.  The type of air pollution created by wildfires is associated with increased all-cause mortality, with the greatest impact on respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Studies have shown that aerosolised coal fly ash is an important risk factor for chronic lung disease, lung cancer and neurodegenerative disease. Failure to recognise multifold adverse consequences of jet-spraying particulates into the atmosphere, we submit, will continue the progression of ever-accelerating ecological disasters.”

Link To Full Article


“California Wildfires: Role of Undisclosed Atmospheric Manipulation and Geoengineering”






November, 2017 Washington, D.C.

Fiscal Years 2018-2022 |  Federal Weather Enterprise Coordination

The purpose of this document is to express the strategic consensus of the member agencies of the Federal Committee for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (FCMSSR) for coordination of the Federal Weather Enterprise (FWE, defined below) over a “foreseeable planning horizon” of about five years.  Link








The Geoengineering Act prohibits deployment of harmful contaminants in our atmosphere and at ground level.

The Geoengineering Act 2020 — H8062

Legislative intent.

(a) To preserve the safe, peaceful uses of Rhode Island’s atmosphere for people, the environment, and agriculture, by regulating geoengineering, weather modification and other large- scale activities and prohibiting activities that are harmful.

(b) “Geoengineering” is defined as the intentional manipulation of the environment, involving nuclear, biological, chemical, electromagnetic and other physical-agent activities that effect changes to the earth’s atmosphere or surface.

(c) The general assembly finds that geoengineering encompasses many technologies and methods involving hazardous activities that can harm human health and safety, the environment, agriculture, aviation, and the economy of the state of Rhode Island.”