Categories
Blog

Why the “Green New Deal” Is NOT A Good Deal At All; Biden: “How I learned to love the New World Order”; 2020 U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations recommends $15,000,000 for cloud-aerosol research

August 16, 2020 | by Jolie Diane |

One would think that with a name likeThe Green New Deal(GND), there would be more to it than a nice marketing slogan.

You might imagine the Green New Deal to be an actual plan to lift up economic and food security through investment in recycling, organic farming and healthy, green, plant-based industries. Or, to protect human health and the environment from the deployment of hazardous pollution like wireless (RF/MW) radiation-transmitting infrastructures, the so-called “smart” grid, satellites, 4G-5G-AI, or to tackle atmospheric aerosol operations like SAI?

Nope. The bill reads like a wishlist of UN Agenda 21/2030, climate predictions based on false models invented by the Club of RomeCarnegie and other private partners, NGO corporate sponsored academics, in lockstep with the UNIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC.

 

From the Green New Deal:

 

“Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal.

Whereas the October 2018 report entitled ‘‘Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 C’’ by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change…”


“..global temperatures must be kept below 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrialized levels to avoid the most severe impacts of a changing climate, which will require—

(A) global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from human sources of 40 to 60 percent from 2010 levels by 2030; and

(B) net-zero global emissions by 2050;  …”

“the United States must take a leading role in reducing emissions through economic transformation;” P.3

 


 

“building or upgrading to energy-efficient, distributed, and ‘‘smart’’ power grids, and ensuring affordable access to electricity;

(E) upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximum energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability, including through electrification;” – P.8

 

 


 

 

For some strange reason, the GND “climate strategy” seems to be partly based on unregulated aerosol injection methods from Soviet military strategy for environmental warfare, weather control and climate modification.

The GND “solution” is not to increase American’s prosperity or to protect human health and the environment by stopping actual pollution. The GND demand is that the United States relinquish sovereignty to submit to UN “leadership” and reduce emissions through “economic transformation.”

America didn’t sign up for UN Agenda 2030.

 


 

September 11, 1991 | 

Former CIA Director, President George H.W.  Bush Sr., New World Order Speech  

“What is at stake is more than one small country. It is a big idea, a new world order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of man kind; peace and security, freedom and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle and worthy of our children’s future.”    
– George Bush Sr. Signed America onto Agenda 21/2030 in 1992.  LINK

 


 

“The ‘affirmative task’ we have now is to actually create a New World Order…”

– Joe Biden Speech at the Export Import Bank conference in Washington on April 5, 2013

Link To Video  Link To Obama-Biden-Geoengineering

 

 

Obama: New World Order

“…and for the international order that we have worked for generations to build. Ordinary men and women are too small minded to govern their own affairs. The order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all powerful sovereign.” -Barak Obama

Link To Video

 

 

 

 

 


 

The “Green New Deal” plan for one world governance, or New World Order is NOT a good deal for The People or the World.

 

 


 

 

“In an article entitled, “How I learned to love the New World Order,” Biden outlines his plans to destroy national sovereignty, establish a one world government, and “breath new life into the U.N. Charter.”

Link To Full Article

The Wall Street Journal Thursday April 23, 1992

Link To Full Article

 

 


 

1.5C “Target” & CO2 Theory is used to justify climate manipulation and weather modification 

 

 

The methods for artificially manipulating Earth’s temperature and weather are well documented in military literature, university studies, and government research.

 

 


 

 

Did you know? CO2 theory, the 1.5C UN, Paris, and “Green New Deal” climate “target,” looks very much like Soviet-U.S. military climate and weather modification strategies.

 

 


 

 

Climate strategy 1971: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency  (DARPA

“..within a few decades world heat production could rise from the present level of 0.2%, of the received power of the Sun to a level of 2%, thus causing a 1-1.5 C mean global temperature increase.  Such a potentially harmful warming trend could, in principle, be checked by artificially increasing the planetary cloud cover.”

“…method of moderating planetary warming trends by temporarily increasing the concentration of sulfate aerosol particles in the lower stratosphere and thereby reducing global radiation.” 

 

 

 


 

Apparently based on the same theory, Climate Strategy 2018:

“Solar geoengineering refers to deliberately reducing net radiative forcing by reflecting some sunlight back to space, in order to reduce anthropogenic climate changes; a possible such approach would be adding aerosols to the stratosphere.”   Link

 

 


 

 

 

U.S. Congress Climate Strategy 2020:

“(2) CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION EFFORTS.— The term ‘‘climate change mitigation efforts’’ means efforts, including the use of technologies, materials, processes, or practices, that contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.”

 

 

 


Why are U.S. elected public servants following  Soviet military strategy and UN Agenda 2030 “climate change theory,” instead following our Constitution and protecting our health & environment by tackling the real sources pollution?  

 

 


 

 

2020 U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations recommends $15,000,000 for cloud-aerosol research

APPROPRIATONS  2020 

“…understanding cloud aerosol effects requires investment in new techniques such as controlled experiments along with observational studies, modeling and computing. The Committee recommends $15,000,000 for cloud-aerosol research, technology innovation and computing.” -Page 115

 

 

 


 

August 17, 2020 | Official Designation | Interagency Council for Advancing Meteorological Services (ICAMS) Charter |

“ICAMS is the formal mechanism by which all relevant Federal departments and agencies (D’s/A’s) coordinate implementation of policy and practices to ensure U.S. global leadership in the meteorological services2 enterprise.”

Who Owns The Weather? CHARTER of the Interagency Council for Advancing Meteorological Services (ICAMS); The Federal Weather Enterprise: Fiscal Year 2021 Budget and Coordination Report; WHITEHOUSE FY 2022 Research & Development Budget

Link  

 

 

 

Geoengineering Trump Pence AirForce_NATO_UN

“4. Research – Federal Weather Enterprise

4.1 Exercise leadership in coordinating U.S. efforts in international weather research priorities including the current World Meteorological Organization Grand Challenges..”  Link To Grand Challenges