“On October 6, Children’s Health Defense board chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and president Lyn Redwood wrote to key members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives asking for a thorough Congressional investigation of the origins of the COVID-19 virus.
Letters were sent to Rand Paul, Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, Ron Johnson, and Ted Cruz in the Senate and to Jim Jordan, Bill Posey, James Comer, and Carolyn Maloney in the House. The full letter is below.
Children’s Health Defense is asking all of our members and supporters to contact their Senators and Representatives urging them to ensure that a thorough investigation of COVID’s origins is launched immediately using our advocacy platform. It’s a great way to weigh in with your federal legislators and just takes a couple minutes. The more you share this with family and friends, the greater the impact we’ll have. Here’s all you need to do:
1) Use the form below to contact your your Congressional representatives.
2) Follow-up with a phone call. (Phone numbers are also listed below the form.)
3) Share with 10 family members or friends.
This form is for US residents only.”
October 6, 2020
Children’s Health Defense
1227 N. Peachtree Pkwy, Suite 202
Peachtree City, GA 30269
Congressman Bill Posey
2150 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Congressman Posey,
Since it first emerged in China in November of last year, SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) has swept across the globe and ravaged communities throughout the United States. The CDC reports that 209,560 Americans have died from COVID-19 as of today, October 6. Millions of Americans have lost their jobsand thousands of U.S. businesses have shut their doors permanently. Our children have had their education and lives disrupted. This disease has reshaped our country.
We are writing to request that you fully investigate this matter of great importance to our nation and to the thousands of individuals and families who are members of Children’s Health Defense. You serve on the House Science, Space, & Technology Committee and these matters fall within the purview of your responsibilities on that Committee. You have the jurisdiction and the duty to lead these investigations, to bring greater understanding and transparency to what happened, and to help the nation.
Defeating this pandemic should be our first priority but we should not be reticent to also ask questions about the virus itself. As humans, we are driven to ask questions and explore the world around us. That is why we have gone to the moon, it’s how we discovered penicillin, and it’s why science continues to advance. This inquisitive spirit that leads us to ask questions and research the problems that we face is the underlying foundation of science, freedom of speech, democracy, and western philosophy.
“Consider this hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a well-regulated, world-class laboratory by experienced investigators, but the information from the experiment is then used by another scientist who does not have the same training and facilities and is not subject to the same regulations. In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?”
These are not our words, but rather they are the words of Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID, in a 2012 letter to the microbiology journal mBioadvocating for gain-of-function experiments. Today, questions about the origin of COVID-19 have largely been dismissed without answers. We believe Dr. Fauci laid out a scenario eight years ago that deserves a full investigation today, particularly when you consider that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was doing the very type of research set forth in Dr. Fauci’s hypothetical scenario.
It would be unthinkable to not investigate the causes leading up to and contributing to the circumstances around the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl,or Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accidents. Is it not strange that we have so quickly moved past the origin of this pandemic? We have a virus that has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people—mostly the elderly—caused severe global economic damage, and destroyed thousands of small businesses across America, and there is little serious consideration as to where this virus originated. Common sense says that we should do everything possible to understand exactly how this novel coronavirus pandemic came about so that we may take steps to ensure that it will not and cannot be repeated.
Some reputable scientists have raised the issue that the virus could have escaped from a lab as Dr. Fauci said was a possibility in 2012. Others have suggested that COVID-19 was a natural result of contact between animals and humans. That may indeed be the case; however, given the magnitude of the impact this pandemic has had on humankind, we need more than mere speculation or finger pointing about its origins. It is our duty to ourselves, to our children, and to humanity to seek out and discover the truth.
A virus escaping from a lab and leading to a pandemic is not just a hypothetical horror story; it is an historical reality—in 1977, the H1N1 flu reappeared in China and swept across the globe. Scientists have identified this outbreak as the result of an escape from an unidentified lab. Moreover, USA Today has done extensive reporting on other dangerous pathogens, including Ebola, SARS, and Anthrax, escaping from labs between 2004 and 2016. More recently ProPublica has reported on the exposures of researchers to chimeric coronaviruses at the University of North Carolina.The National Academy of Science and the Federal Select Agent Program have both documented the risks of research being done on highly dangerous pathogens. Some of these escapes have involved viruses similar to SARS-CoV-2. Fortunately, these escapes have rarely led to any infections, but we must take this investigation seriously because these pathogens represent some of the deadliest diseases humanity has encountered. COVID 19 is the sentinel deadly warning of worse to come and we ignore its origins at our own peril.
COVID-19 first broke out in the city of Wuhan, in the shadow of the world’s leading coronavirus research lab, but the communist Chinese government originally labeled a neighboring wet market as the point of origin of the virus. Investigations have shown that the virus started in the province as early as November 17th and that the market was only an early super spreader event. The Huanan market in Wuhan is very far from the Yunnan province caves where similar coronaviruses were found but it is only a few miles from the Wuhan Institute of Virology which was performing coronavirus research on SARS-like viruses.
In order to determine the cause of COVID 19, the first question to ask is “do we know what research the scientists conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology?” We can answer this question with information from grants provided to the Wuhan lab and its very own scientific publications.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is a biosafety level-4 lab that has made its reputation studying infectious diseases, particularly coronaviruses similar to SARS. In fact, because coronaviruses are endemic to bats, Zheng-Li Shi, the virologist directing coronavirus research, was nicknamed China’s “Bat Woman.” As a part of their work, researchers in the Wuhan lab were engaged in engineering SARS-like viruses through what is known as “gain-of-function” coronavirus research. We also know that U.S. taxpayer dollars through the National Institutes of Health were funding some of that work (see below, NIH grant NIAID R01AI110964 that was awarded in 2014 via a third party – EcoHealth Alliance in New York). Gain-of-function research takes existing pathogens and tries to make them more dangerous for humans with the ultimate goal being to prepare vaccines and therapeutics to combat future emergent viruses. The Wuhan Institute of Virology was combining and manipulating SARS-like coronaviruses in the hopes of better understanding how the original SARS pandemic came about and to prepare for new viruses that could emerge from bats. In the course of this research they engineered new SARS-like viruses that were efficient at infecting humans cells through the same receptor that the SARS virus uses. SARS-CoV-2 is this exact type of virus that Wuhan researchers were creating and storing. In fact, the closest relative of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the RaTG13 virus which is studied and stored exclusively at the Wuhan Institute. Moreover, Ralph Baric, a leading U.S. coronavirus researcher, has pointed out that it is possible to engineer a virus without leaving a trace. He notes that SARS-CoV-2 was not engineered with any known published genetic information and that it is not possible to tell if it was engineered using an unpublished genetic sequence.
In the November 30, 2017, issue of the medical journal PLOS Pathogens, Zheng-Li Shi and other Wuhan researchers describe how they constructed chimeric novel coronaviruses – that is new genetically-engineered coronaviruses by combining the genetic materials from various known coronaviruses. They show in the paper that three of these chimeric coronaviruses were found to be easily transmitted in human cells. In other words, they were potentially highly infectious to humans. This paper also notes that it was partially funded by the 2014 U.S. National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) grant (R01Al110964) provided to New York-based EcoHealth Alliance. A number of other federal grants, in the amount of $53 million, have been awarded to EcoHealth from various federal agencies over the past decade. The Wall Street Journal has reported that the NIH recently demanded that EcoHealth turn over all of the information they have about the research resulting from their work relating to Wuhan and coronaviruses.The US Congress and the American people have a right to know exactly what work their tax dollars supported in China. Even without China’s assistance, much of this information may be obtained in greater detail, and by subpoena if necessary, from quarterly and annual reports, emails, meetings, and phone communications by the grant program managers and involved staff at NIAID and EcoHealth both between themselves and Wuhan.
The timing of the 2014 grant has raised additional questions; it was awarded at the same time the United States was imposing a moratorium on gain-of-function research. The NIH put this moratorium in place due to concerns of prior pathogen escapes from biosafety rated laboratories. In 2015, University of North Carolina virologists, who had previously been studying coronaviruses, published a paper with researchers in Wuhan. As noted in the paper, this work was funded by a grant awarded prior to the moratorium. These researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology later continued their work after the moratorium using grant money awarded to EcoHealth Alliance from NIAID. The Wuhan Institute has performed groundbreaking studies of SARS and made tremendous gains in coronavirus research, but no lab is immune to safety failures or escapes. In fact, the Washington Post reportedthat 2018 internal State Department memos outlined serious concerns about safety lapses at the Wuhan lab.
More recently, on September 15, the Telegraph reported that “an international team of scientists will examine the possibility SARS-CoV-2 leaked from a laboratory.” The article also reports that the leader of this team will be Peter Daszak who is the President of EcoHealth Alliance which funded gain-of-function coronavirus research in the same Wuhan lab that he is being called to investigate. While Dr. Daszak is a well-respected expert on emerging infectious diseases, there are clear conflicts of interest that must be addressed.
Given the destruction that this COVID-19 pandemic has caused, and the various issues raised above, the American people who have been harmed deserve a thorough investigation into the origins of this virus. There are many questions that the American people, the US Congress, our children and our parents deserve answers to. Among them are:
Did COVID-19 evolve naturally and if so, how did it so readily infect the human population?
- If it evolved naturally, why did the outbreak occur more than 1,000 miles from where similar strains of bat coronaviruses are found in Yunnan caves?
- The original SARS virus rapidly mutated after it entered the human population in 2002 and only stopped late in the pandemic but, from the beginning, SARS-CoV-2 (the COVID-19 virus) has remained very genetically stable in human populations suggesting a unique adaptation to the human host and transmission. What are likely explanations for this stability?
- Though scientists initially suspected that pangolins were the intermediate host, that theory has been rejected; what other intermediate hosts explain the virus’ adaptation to human transmission that has made it so dangerous?
- Why, of all places, did the outbreak occur in the shadow of the Wuhan lab where coronavirus research was being conducted, if the outbreak and the lab have no connection?
Did COVID-19 escape from the Wuhan lab? If so:
- How did this happen?
- What were the lab failures or safety protocols that were violated?
- What measures can be taken to ensure that there is never again a pandemic with lab origins?
Could COVID-19 be the result of gain-of-function research? And, if so:
- Are there are other coronaviruses, being held at the Wuhan Institute of Virology or elsewhere, that are more similar to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13 is?
- Has the Wuhan lab made all of the coronavirus genomes that it has sequenced publicly available for the scientific community to study?
- What did officials at NIH, NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and other U.S. entities know about the details of the gain-of-function research taking place at the Wuhan lab?
- Do the NIH, NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance or anyone associated with these organizations know any details related to the possible origins of COVID-19 that have not been shared with the American people?
- Should U.S. taxpayer money have been provided to the Wuhan lab given the safety protocol issues highlighted in U.S. government documents and U.S. newspaper reporting?
- Did the NIH funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan in 2014-2019 violate the letter or spirit of the U.S. moratorium on gain-of-function research that was put in place in 2014?
- Was the R01Al110964 grant from NIH to EcoHealth Alliance orchestrated in such a manner that it was intended to circumvent the U.S. moratorium on gain-of-function research? Were US government officials aware of the use of this grant for gain-of-function research in spite of the funding pause?
- Did any other U.S. government grants to EcoHealth aid the gain-of-function research taking place at the Wuhan lab? A lab that was involved in very risky “gain-of-function”
We are not suggesting malintent. Indeed, nobody at the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, or Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facilities meant for a dangerous radiation leak to happen. Harm and malevolence arise from silencing those who are demanding answers or failing to investigate the pandemic’s origin, mistakes made, and how best to prevent future events from recurring. For most people currently alive, COVID-19 is the greatest destructive event of their lifetime, and is a defining time point in world history. China, by the nature of its communist political system, cannot be relied on to thoroughly investigate this matter. It falls upon the leadership of the U.S. Congress to accept its moral duty and God-given and legally pre-ordained responsibility to launch complete and transparent investigations. The grants and publications which show that U.S.-funded coronavirus gain-of-function research was taking place at Wuhan are public and cannot be ignored forever. If we do nothing, history will hold us and our system of government accountable.
We trust that you, your office, and the House Science, Space, & Technology Committee will take the steps necessary for a full and thorough investigation into the issues of the origin of the virus. The Lancet COVID-19 Commission, which chose Daszak to lead their investigation into the origins of the virus, cannot be trusted to effectively eliminate conflicts of interest from their investigation. This shows the need for an independent investigation by the leaders that we have elected to guide us through crises such as these. This investigation must begin in earnest and with haste.
Please review the linked (attached) documents which substantiate the issues raised.
Robert Kennedy, Jr., Chairman
Children’s Health Defense
Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, President
Children’s Health Defense
Cc: Senator Rand Paul, Senator Tom Cotton, Senator Ron Johnson, Senator Josh Hawley, U.S. Representative Jim Jordan, U.S. Representative Carolyn Maloney, U.S. Representative James Comer
 “Updated Estimates of the Impact of COVID-19 on Global Poverty,” World Bank, accessed September 14, 2020, https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/updated-estimates-impact-covid-19-global-poverty.
 “Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on The Employment Situation for August 2020: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.bls.gov/covid19/employment-situation-covid19-faq-august-2020.htm.
 “Yelp: Local Economic Impact Report,” Yelp Economic Impact Report, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.yelpeconomicaverage.com/yelp-coronavirus-economic-impact-report.
 Xing-Lou Yang et al., “Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Bat Coronavirus Closely Related to the Direct Progenitor of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus,” Journal of Virology 90, no. 6 (December 30, 2015): 3253–56, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02582-15.
 “NRC: Backgrounder on the Three Mile Island Accident,” United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html.
 “NRC: Backgrounder on Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident,” United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/chernobyl-bg.html.
 “NRC: Backgrounder on NRC Response to Lessons Learned from Fukushima,” United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/japan-events.html.
 “COVID-19 Provisional Counts – Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics,” CDC Provisional Counts, September 9, 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm.
 “Coronavirus: The Economic Impact – 10 July 2020 | UNIDO,” accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.unido.org/stories/coronavirus-economic-impact-10-july-2020#story-start.
 “Yelp: Economic Impact Report” https://www.yelpeconomicaverage.com/yelp-coronavirus-economic-impact-report.
 Though written and published very early in the pandemic the following article by Andersen et al. remains the only significant investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2: Kristian G. Andersen et al., “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” Nature Medicine 26, no. 4 (April 2020): 450–52, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9.
 Shing Hei Zhan, Benjamin E. Deverman, and Yujia Alina Chan, “SARS-CoV-2 Is Well Adapted for Humans. What Does This Mean for Re-Emergence?,” BioRxiv, May 2, 2020, 2020.05.01.073262, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.01.073262; Jean Claude Perez and Luc Montagnier, “COVID-19, SARS and Bats Coronaviruses Genomes Unexpected Exogenous RNA Sequences,” n.d., 39 https://osf.io/d9e5g/; “Could COVID-19 Have Escaped from a Lab?,” Boston Magazine, September 9, 2020, https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2020/09/09/alina-chan-broad-institute-coronavirus/.
 H. C. Kung et al., “Influenza in China in 1977: Recurrence of Influenzavirus A Subtype H1N1,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 56, no. 6 (1978): 1.
 Michelle Rozo and Gigi Kwik Gronvall, “The Reemergent 1977 H1N1 Strain and the Gain-of-Function Debate,” MBio 6, no. 4 (September 1, 2015): 1,https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01013-15; Joel O. Wertheim, “The Re-Emergence of H1N1 Influenza Virus in 1977: A Cautionary Tale for Estimating Divergence Times Using Biologically Unrealistic Sampling Dates,” PLOS ONE 5, no. 6 (June 17, 2010): 1, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011184
 Alison Young, “Hundreds of Bioterror Lab Mishaps Cloaked in Secrecy,” USA TODAY, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/17/reports-of-incidents-at-bioterror-select-agent-labs/14140483/; “Inside America’s Secretive Biolabs,” USA TODAY, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/05/28/biolabs-pathogens-location-incidents/26587505/; Alison Young, “Hundreds of Safety Incidents with Bioterror Germs Reported by Secretive Labs,” USA TODAY, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/06/30/lab-safety-transparency-report/86577070/.
 Jessica Blake and Alison Young, “Here Are Six Accidents UNC Researchers Had With Lab-Created Coronaviruses,” ProPublica, accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.propublica.org/article/here-are-six-accidents-unc-researchers-had-with-lab-created-coronaviruses.
 Board on Life Sciences et al., Gain-of-Function Research: Summary of the Second Symposium, March 10-11, 2016, ed. Piers Millett et al. (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2016), https://doi.org/10.17226/23484; Alison Hottes, Benjamin Rusek, and Fran Sharples, Biosecurity Challenges of the Global Expansion of High-Containment Biological Laboratories (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.17226/13315; “Federal Select Agent Program – Select Agents and Toxins List,” accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.selectagents.gov/SelectAgentsandToxinsList.html.
 Several of the outbreaks at UNC involved SARS-associated coronaviruses and one exposure in April 2020 was to lab-adapted SARS-CoV-2. Blake and Young, “UNC Accidents with Lab-Created Coronaviruses” https://www.propublica.org/article/near-misses-at-unc-chapel-hills-high-security-lab-illustrate-risk-of-accidents-with-coronaviruses “Six Accidents UNC Researchers Had” https://www.propublica.org/article/here-are-six-accidents-unc-researchers-had-with-lab-created-coronaviruses
 “Federal Select Agent Program – Select Agents and Toxins List.” https://www.selectagents.gov/SelectAgentsandToxinsList.html.
 “Wuhan’s Huanan Seafood Market a Victim of COVID-19: CDC Director – Global Times,” accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1189506.shtml; “China’s First Confirmed Covid-19 Case Traced Back to November 17,” South China Morning Post, March 13, 2020, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3074991/coronavirus-chinas-first-confirmed-covid-19-case-traced-back.
 Xing-Yi Ge et al., “Coexistence of Multiple Coronaviruses in Several Bat Colonies in an Abandoned Mineshaft,” Virologica Sinica 31, no. 1 (February 2016): 31–40, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-016-3713-9.
 Chung-Chau Hon et al., “Evidence of the Recombinant Origin of a Bat Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-Like Coronavirus and Its Implications on the Direct Ancestor of SARS Coronavirus,” Journal of Virology82, no. 4 (February 2008): 1819–26, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01926-07; Yang et al., “Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Bat Coronavirus Closely Related to the Direct Progenitor of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus” https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02582-15.
 Ben Hu et al., “Discovery of a Rich Gene Pool of Bat SARS-Related Coronaviruses Provides New Insights into the Origin of SARS Coronavirus,” PLoS Pathogens 13, no. 11 (November 2017): e1006698, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698. See the “Funding” section for information on grant NIAID R01AI110964.
 Lei-Ping Zeng et al., “Bat Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Like Coronavirus WIV1 Encodes an Extra Accessory Protein, ORFX, Involved in Modulation of the Host Immune Response,” Journal of Virology 90, no. 14 (15 2016): 6573–82, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.03079-15.
 Yang et al., “Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Bat Coronavirus Closely Related to the Direct Progenitor of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus.” https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02582-15.
 “Possibile creare un virus in laboratorio senza lasciare traccia? La risposta dell’autore della chimera del 2015 di cui parlò Tg Leonardo,” L’HuffPost, September 14, 2020, https://www.huffingtonpost.it/entry/e-possibile-creare-un-virus-in-laboratorio-senza-lasciare-traccia-la-risposta-dellesperto_it_5f5f3993c5b62874bc1f7339.
 Sarah Scoles, “How Do We Know If a Virus Is Bioengineered?,” Medium, August 5, 2020, https://onezero.medium.com/how-do-we-know-if-a-virus-is-bioengineered-541ff6f8a48f.
 “EcoHealth Alliance Funding,” accessed September 14, 2020, https://www.usaspending.gov/keyword_search/EcoHealth.
 Betsy McKay, “WSJ News Exclusive | NIH Presses U.S. Nonprofit for Information on Wuhan Virology Lab,” Wall Street Journal, August 19, 2020, sec. US, https://www.wsj.com/articles/nih-presses-u-s-nonprofit-for-information-on-wuhan-virology-lab-11597829400.
 “Doing Diligence to Assess the Risks and Benefits of Life Sciences Gain-of-Function Research,” whitehouse.gov, October 17, 2014, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/10/17/doing-diligence-assess-risks-and-benefits-life-sciences-gain-function-research; “EcoHealth Alliance Funding” https://www.usaspending.gov/keyword_search/EcoHealth.
 Richard D. Henkel, Thomas Miller, and Robbin S. Weyant, “Monitoring Select Agent Theft, Loss and Release Reports in the United States—2004–2010,” Applied Biosafety 17, no. 4 (December 1, 2012): 171–80, https://doi.org/10.1177/153567601201700402; “Inside America’s Secretive Biolabs” https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/05/28/biolabs-pathogens-location-incidents/26587505/; Young, “Hundreds of Bioterror Lab Mishaps Cloaked in Secrecy” https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/17/reports-of-incidents-at-bioterror-select-agent-labs/14140483/.
 M. M. Becker et al., “Synthetic Recombinant Bat SARS-like Coronavirus Is Infectious in Cultured Cells and in Mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, no. 50 (December 16, 2008): 19944–49, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808116105; Vineet D. Menachery et al., “A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Shows Potential for Human Emergence,” Nature Medicine 21, no. 12 (December 2015): 1508–13, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3985.
 Josh Rogin, “Opinion | State Department Cables Warned of Safety Issues at Wuhan Lab Studying Bat Coronaviruses,” Washington Post, accessed July 31, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-bat-coronaviruses/; “State Department FOIA Results,” accessed September 15, 2020, https://foia.state.gov/Search/Results.aspx?caseNumber=F-2020-05255.
 Paul Nuki and Sarah Newey, “Scientists to Examine Possibility Covid Leaked from Lab as Part of Investigation into Virus Origins,” The Telegraph, September 15, 2020, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/scientists-examine-possibility-covid-leaked-lab-part-investigation/.
 “Dr. Peter Daszak,” EcoHealth Alliance, accessed September 30, 2020, https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/personnel/dr-peter-daszak.
 Jimmy Lee et al., “No Evidence of Coronaviruses or Other Potentially Zoonotic Viruses in Sunda Pangolins (Manis Javanica) Entering the Wildlife Trade via Malaysia,” BioRxiv, June 19, 2020, 2020.06.19.158717, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.19.158717.
 “EcoHealth Alliance Funding” https://www.usaspending.gov/keyword_search/EcoHealth.
 Hu et al., “Discovery of a Rich Gene Pool of Bat SARS-Related Coronaviruses Provides New Insights into the Origin of SARS Coronavirus” https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006698; Michael J. Selgelid, “Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis,” Science and Engineering Ethics 22, no. 4 (2016): 923–64, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9810-1.
 Nuki and Newey, “Scientists to Examine Possibility Covid Leaked from Lab as Part of Investigation into Virus Origins.”