Categories
Blog

Crimes Against Humanity, fraudulent PCR Tests Taken To Court – Interview with Lawyer Reiner Füellmich

November 11, 2020 | Dr. Reiner Fuellmich | Video |

Main Questions:

1. How dangerous is the virus?

Infection mortality rate of .14% – About roughly the same as that of the common flu, so CV is about as dangerous as the common flu.

 

2.How much damage do the anti-corona measures do both health-wise for the world’s population and as far as the economy is concerned?

Damage goes far beyond anything that’s ever been experienced on a global level.

 

3.How much can we trust the PCR tests?

PCR test can not tell you anything about infections. The only thing they are good for is to cause panic.

 

Link To Video 

 

 


 

Re: PCR Tests — “Contrary to official assurances they are completely unsuitable for detecting an infection.”

Link To Video

Transcript of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s “Crimes Against Humanity”

Link

 


PCR Tests
Dr. Thomas Cowan: There is no such thing as a covid case.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/X5tZPoHOuCr3/
Dr. Thomas Cowan – Debunking Peer Reviewed Claims of Covid-19 isolation
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jwQV79H88CBs/
Dr. Andrew Kaufman Covid-19 RT PCR Test Fraud
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1CaOakqVSTh5/

US Patent 2020279585: PCR Test Submitted by Richard Rothschild

Link

Germ Theory – Dr. Lorraine Day

Masks
A mask is a medical device. Only a licensed physician is qualified to recommend wearing a mask.
*Forcing someone to wear a mask, which is a medical intervention, without required medical credentials or informed consent, is not only illegally practicing medicine without a license by unqualified politicians, unelected bureaucrats and businesses.  It’s violating our most basic laws protecting human civil rights, and causing harm to People by deliberately starving them of oxygen [forced covering of the nose and mouth causes suffocation] and forcing the hazard of rebreathing one’s own CO2.

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect anyone who comes near that precious jewel.”

MASK OFF!

 



Dangers of oxygen-deficient 
atmospheres
“Workers can become asphyxiated by exposure to atmospheres deficient of oxygen, that can lead to serious injury or loss of life.

“Effects of exposure to low oxygen concentrations can include giddiness, mental confusion, loss of judgment, loss of coordination, weakness, nausea, fainting, loss of consciousness and death.”

How inhaled CO2 affects the body
“When there is exposure to very high levels of CO2, in excess of 5% (50,000 ppm), the body’s compensatory mechanisms can become overwhelmed, and the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord) functions are depressed, then fail. Death soon follows.”


Scientific Peer Reviewed Articles regarding hazards and ineffectiveness of wearing masks:

Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock – Masks Pose serious Risks To The Healthy
1981 Surgeon Study – Neil W M Orr MD
 Conclusion: “It would appear that minimum contamination can best be achieved by not wearing a mask at all

Ritter et al.
, in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.”
Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.”
Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.
In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.
A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that “The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.
Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.”
Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.
Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.
Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.
Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.
Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.” Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.
Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.”
Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.”
Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.”
BCMJ, vol. 58 , No. 10 , December 2016 , Pages 554, 556 Point Counterpoint By:  Will Offley, RN BC Medical Journal
Cover up: The lack of evidence for vaccinate or mask policies
More Peer Reviewed literature regarding the harm and Inefficacy of face masks:

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.full
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18331781/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-35797-3
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577#T1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21477136/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28039289/
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.long
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20584862/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22188875/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29855107/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29678452/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25806411/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23108786/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25858901/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5333967/
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article
https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x
https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381
http://www.medtau.org/ice-ccm/pandemic/N95.pdf
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/testing-the-efficacy-of-homemade-masks-would-they-protect-in-an-influenza-pandemic/0921A05A69A9419C862FA2F35F819D55
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/11/3/494/397025
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2011.0537
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-12-106
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2010.0686
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-011-9056-7


 

 

Link To Article: “The Constitution isn’t suspended because of coronavirus.”

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-constitution-isnt-suspended-because-of-coronovirus/

The US Constitution is the law of the land.

Fourteenth Amendment Annotated

“…No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”