Professor Perronne and the Vaccine: “We Do Not Want to Become, Like Tomatoes or Corn Transgenic GMOs ”
Letter from Christian Perronne, head of the infectious and Tropical Diseases Department of the Garches Hospital (92) – France.
France, which has been living a nightmare for months, is waking up. In many cities of our beautiful country, the people are marching to regain their freedom, to demand the return of democracy. As a physician, a specialist in infectious diseases, and having served as president of many public health bodies or councils, including on vaccines, every day I measure the uncertainties generating the growing fear and dismay of our fellow citizens.
I take the risk of being called a “conspiracy theorist” or better, “covidiot,” again, terms referring to those who criticize or challenge the Party line. I’ve ended up being proud of these names, as my words expressing the truth have never changed since the outbreak began. I therefore consider it my responsibility to express myself again today on the entire medical aspect of Covid-19 and in particular on the subject of vaccination, now the central and almost the sole element of the state’s health policy.
Many French people have been mesmerized by the politics of fear. Since September 2020, we have been warned there would be a second terrible wave of the epidemic, worse than the first. The Minister of Health, Dr Olivier Véran, the president of the Scientific Council of the Elysée, Professor Jean François Delfraissy, the Director General of Health, Professor Jérôme Salomon, the Institut Pasteur, have all predicted catastrophic figures with an exponential increase in the number of deaths. Hospitals were bound to be overcrowded and overwhelmed.
Even the president of the Republic, during a recent televised address announcing the new lockdown, predicted no fewer than 400,000 deaths, adding to the 200,000 deaths estimated shortly before by Pr. Arnaud Fontanet de Pasteur. These unrealistic figures had only one purpose, to stoke the public’s fear in order to keep us confined, wisely masked. Yet the widespread use of masks in the general population has not been scientifically demonstrated to be of any value in curbing the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. The people who should wear masks are those who are ill and the people who are close to them, in contact with them (especially if they are at risk themselves), and caregivers.
“Even the president of the Republic, during a recent televised address announcing the new lockdown, predicted no fewer than 400,000 deaths, adding to the 200,000 deaths estimated shortly before by Pr. Arnaud Fontanet de Pasteur. These unrealistic figures had only one purpose, to stoke the public’s fear in order to keep us confined, wisely masked.”
But the epidemic is waning and has not led to any apocalypse. For weeks, the shape of the curve has followed the typical profile of a seasonal epidemic rebound that is observed with certain viruses, once the real epidemic wave is over. This testifies to the adaptation of the virus to humans and it also reflects the collective immunity that is growing in the population and that protects us naturally.
The virus strains that are currently circulating have lost their virulence. The authorities cannot claim that this is thanks to the lockdown, because the downward trend had already begun, even before it was put in place. The epidemic had already begun to ebb in some towns before the curfew was even introduced.
Unfortunately, there are still deaths occuring among the very old, the very obese, or people with severe diabetes, severe high blood pressure, or already disabling cardiorespiratory or kidney diseases. These people who are at risk are readily identified. Health measures should therefore be aimed at protecting, screening and treating them as early as possible from the onset of symptoms, with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, whose efficacy and safety are widely confirmed when treatment is given early.
Many deaths could have been prevented. GPs and geriatricians have been discouraged from providing treatment. Considering this, continuing to persecute our children by making them wear masks is simply incomprehensible.
All these measures have been taken in oreder to make the French people demand a vaccine. But what is the benefit of a generalized vaccine for a disease whose mortality is close to 0.05%? None. This mass vaccination is useless. In addition, the risks of vaccination may be greater than the benefits.
The most worrisome thing is that many countries, including France, say they are ready to start vaccinating in the coming weeks, while these products have been developed and evaluated very hastily, and to date, no results have been published showing how effective – or dangerous – these vaccines are. We’ve only been shown the press releases from industrial manufacturers, who have seen their shares soar on the stock exchange.
“The first ‘vaccines’ we are being offered are not vaccines, but gene therapy products. We’re going to inject nucleic acids that will cause our own cells to make elements of the virus”
The worst thing is that the first “vaccines” we are being offered are not vaccines, but gene therapy products. We’re going to inject nucleic acids that will cause our own cells to make elements of the virus. We absolutely do not know the consequences of this injection, because it is a first in humans. What if the cells of some of the people who get “vaccinated” produce too many viral elements, causing uncontrollable reactions in our body ?
The first gene therapies will be RNA, but there are projects in the works using DNA. Normally, in our cells, the message is from DNA to RNA, but the reverse is possible under certain circumstances. Since the dawn of time our human cells have contained so-called “endogenous” retroviruses integrated into the DNA of our chromosomes. These “domesticated” retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless (unlike HIV, AIDS retroviruses for example), but they can produce an enzyme, reverse transcriptase, that is able to reverse transcribe RNA into DNA.
So an RNA that is foreign to our body and administered by injection could code for DNA that is just as foreign, which can then integrate into our chromosomes. There is a real risk of transforming our genes permanently. There is also the possibility, through the modification of the nucleic acids of our eggs or spermatozoa, to transmit these genetic modifications to our children. The people who promote these gene therapies, falsely called “vaccines,” are sorcerer’s apprentices and are treating the French (and more generally the citizens of the world) like guinea pigs.
“The people who promote these gene therapies, falsely called “vaccines,” are sorcerer’s apprentices and are treating the French (and more generally the citizens of the world) like guinea pigs”
We do not want to become transgenic GMOs (genetically modified organisms), like tomatoes or corn. A medical official at one of the pharmaceutical manufacturers said a few days ago that he hoped for an individual protective effect, but that one should not expect to see too much impact on the transmission of the virus, and therefore on the dynamics of the epidemic. This is a disguised admission that it is not a vaccine. This is a very serious matter.
I am all the more horrified, given that I have always been in favor of vaccines and I have chaired vaccine policy forums for years. Today we must say stop to this extremely disturbing plan. Louis Pasteur must be spinning in his grave.
Science, medical ethics and above all common sense must regain the upper hand.”