Categories
Blog

Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19

February 17, 2021 | Stand for Health Freedom | Link To Send Email To Investigate CDC |

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on_p-sKxjGc&feature=youtu.be

Link To Video

Link To Send Letter Calling for Investigation into CDC’s Conduct During Covid-19

 

Panelists

Sayer Ji (Moderator) – Author; Founder of GreenMedInfo; Co-founder, Stand for Health Freedom

 

Dr. Peter Breggin – World-renowned psychiatrist and medical ethicist Mary Starrett – Chair, Board of Commissioners, Yamhill County, Oregon

 

Dr. David Martin – Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc.; Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration

 

Mark Thielman – Superintendent, Alsea School District (Oregon)

 

Ana Garner, Esq. – Attorney; Creator, Higher Path Solutions

 

Dennis Linthicum – Oregon State Senator

 

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler – Biomedical researcher; Scientific journal author; IPAK

 

Dr. Henry Ealy – Naturopath; Scientific journal author; Energetic Healing Institute

 

Link To_Stand For Health Freedom

 

 


 

 

October 12, 2020 |  Authors: Henry Ealy ∗, †, Michael McEvoy ‡§, Daniel Chong , John Nowicki , Monica Sava ¶, Sandeep Gupta ∥ ∗∗ †† ‡‡, David White , James Jordan , Daniel Simon , Paul Anderson |  Science, Public Health Policy, and The LawVolume 2:4-22 |  Source  |

 

Abstract

“This historical retrospective will provide a timeline summary of events to help the reader orient themselves to many aspects of the crisis previously unknown and will discuss the significance of the March 24, 2020 COVID- 19 Alert No. 2 that had a dramatic impact upon cause of death reporting numbers. Supportive data comparisons suggest the existing COVID-19 fatality data, which has been so influential upon public policy, may be substantially compromised regarding accuracy and integrity, and illegal under existing federal laws. If the fatality data being presented by the CDC is illegally inflated, then all public health policies based upon them would be immediately null and void.”

 

Conclusion

“Arguing over what the most accurate COVID fatality count may be is an exercise in futility without intimate knowledge of case history and accompanying certificates of death, and it is the exact reason we entrust these determinations to the skill of our licensed professionals. With the inclusion of probable fatalities and significant changes made to how certificates of death are recorded exclusively for COVID-19 , scientific objectivity demands that we acknowledge the data presented is inaccurate.

Federal agencies have a legal obligation to provide the most accurate data to the public, fellow agencies, and policy makers they are advising, and they have a responsibility to abide by every federal law. This responsibility to collect, analyze, and publish data accurately, transparently, and with unquestionable integrity increases exponentially during a national crisis.

It is concerning that the CDC may have willfully failed to collect, analyze, and publish accurate data used by elected officials to develop public health policy for a nation in crisis.

Further federal investigation is justified by the magnitude of the crisis and the collateral damage generated by policies based upon projection data that was unproven and never peer reviewed. If the data being reported was indeed compromised by the CDC’s perplexing decision to abandon proven data collection and reporting practices in favor of untested methods, then all public health policies based upon these inaccurate data must be reexamined.”

 

Link To Full Document_COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective