Researchers familiar with Carnegie history in eugenics are unlikely to be surprised by C2G alignment with the United Nations Agenda 2030 / Sustainable Development Goals and Carnegie council leadership in geoengineering funding and governance. -JD
March 2022 | Solar Radiation Modification: A Risk-Risk Analysis | Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative |PDF
Authors: Felgenhauer, T., Bala, G., Borsuk, M., Brune, M., Camilloni, I., Wiener, J.B., Xu, J.
“New governance institutions or mechanisms may be needed to restrain harmful or unjust use of SRM, ensure that any deployment is beneficial and just, and assess and minimize any countervailing harms. Existing international governance aimed at addressing climate change and its impacts may offer some useful mechanisms, but currently appears to be inadequately designed for addressing SRM and its distinctive characteristics. As an attempt to restrain the imposition of global risks through hasty or unwise action, governance of SRM may be more analogous to arms control agreements than environmental treaties.” -p.46 LINK
This report was commissioned and funded by the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G) which is an initiative of the Carnegie Council for Ethics and International Affairs (CCEIA).
Harvard / “Funding for Solar Geoengineering Research from 2008-2018” Link
Link To Document_Harvard_Solar Geoengineering_Funding_chart
Link To Report_Eugenical Sterilization in the United States