Categories
Alphabet Agencies Biometric Surveillance Blog Corruption Environment Freedom Health National Security USA States Zero5G

1978 EPA Report: Efforts to Protect the Public from Radiation

August 18, 2023 | Zero5G.com | Image source_Biological Effects Of RadioFrequency Radiation 1984

A 1978 Government Accounting Office (GAO) report on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) efforts to protect the public from exposure to low-level radiation was requested by New York Congressmember Elizabeth Holtzman, in August 1977.

 

The potential harmful health effects of low-level radiation were recognized and became a subject of national interest.

 

According to the 15 page report, symptoms attributed to low-level exposure to radiation include, “headache, weariness, dizziness, irritability, emotional instability, partial loss of memory, loss of appetite, cardiovascular effects, electroencephalogram changes, blood chemistry changes, changes in respiration, and possible genetic effects.”

 

Today there are zero agencies monitoring or measuring radiation to protect public health and environmental safety. 

 

Despite the lack of a protective safety standard and the failure of government agencies to stop radiation, individuals and communities everywhere are organizing to establish strong regulatory barriers at the local level to stop radiation deployments, prevent harm, and protect all life.

 


 

Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency To Protect the Public from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures

 

 

“–the U.S. standard for extended human occupational exposure to microwave radiation is approximately 1,000 times greater than the Soviet Union’s published standard.”  -p. 3

 

Link To Full Report HERE

1978 Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency To Protect the Public from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures.PDF

 


 

Related

 

Early Research on the Biological Effects of Microwave Radiation: 1940-1960 

 

H.R. 10790 — “Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968”; COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934 

 

1972 NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE

 

1981 NASA Study of Electromagnetic Radiation Effects on the Human Body, 1971 Naval Medical Research 

 

Bioeffects of RadioFrequency Radiation_EPA_1984.pdf 

 

1988–MICROWAVE ANTENNA GUIDELINES FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES 

 

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms 

 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying FCC and ICNIRP exposure limits determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G (icbe-emf.org)

 

 


 

jdfor2024.com

 


 

Categories
Biometric Surveillance Biowarfare Blog Corruption Cyber security Depopulation Environment Free Speech Freedom Military National Security NATO Propaganda War

The internet domain & the invisible war on your brain

July 31, 2023 | Information warfare is not something that we often think of while scrolling through internet feeds and surfing online. However, each of us is now a target of psychological warfare, designed specifically for us according to our preferences based on our unique online history – to alter our perceptions and change our behaviors.

Dividing and conquering the population and getting people to lose their minds, is a primary objective of cognitive warfare.

A 2022 NATO report titled “Cognitive Warfare”: The Advent of the Concept of “Cognitics” in the Field of Warfare, states:

“Cognitive warfare is now with us. The main challenge is that it is essentially invisible; all you see is its impact, and by then … it is often too late…

It operates on a global stage since humankind as a whole is now digitally connected. It uses information technology and the tools, machines, networks, and systems that come with it. Its target is clear: our individual intelligences, to be considered both individually and as a group.”

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory 

 

We witnessed the success of cognitive warfare strategy achieved during the CV19 operation.

During the planned CV19 event, reasonable and rational people were fooled and coerced into collectivist compliance by means of government and social media propaganda. We were socially engineered to be terrified of an invisible enemy, that we later found out was just a bad flu made in a lab.

 

One aspect of information warfare that deserves more scrutiny is the role of RF/MW Radiation exposure on brain impairment. Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms | Military Medical Research | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms • ZERO5G

 

The foundation of cognitive warfare is built on wireless communications infrastructures [satellite networks and interoperable microwave antenna systems, aka “+4G+5G+6G+”] toward an overarching Artificial Intelligence (AI).

 

Why You Should Destroy Your Smart Phone Now 

Cognitive warfare seeks to divide individuals and populations while inducing fear, doubt, confusion, violence, despair and defeat.

 

Keep in mind that the U.S. military may be operating under NATO command and that all NWO roads lead back to UN Agenda 2030.

 

The Amazing Deception 

The Amazing Deception

 

Counteracting cognitive warfare involves consciously unplugging ourselves from the internet and social media, continually questioning and scrutinizing information for accuracy, gaining local control of wireless infrastructures, while preferring and prioritizing wired connections to boost security.

 


 

U.S. Psychological Warfare and Civilian Targeting: Peace Review: Vol 22, No 3 

Link To Article HERE

 


 

“Cognitive Warfare”: The Advent of the Concept of “Cognitics” in the Field of Warfare – Archive ouverte HAL

Link To Full Article_NATO-CSO-Cognitive Warfare 2022-03-01 (US) Claverie DuCluzel

 


 

“Brain Science from Bench to Battlefield: The Realities – and Risks – of Neuroweapons”

August 29, 2017 | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |  Dr. James Giordano

Link To Video

 


 

Related

NATO and the Militarization of 5G

The Brain is the Battlefield: The Realities of Neuroweapons 

How electromagnetic weapons induce disease and mentally disable entire populations 

Psycho-Neurobiology and War 

A Cognitive Model for Exposition of Human Deception and Counterdeception

Attack on the Brain: Neurowars and Neurowarfare 

Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness

Disconnecting from the UN Digital Prison 

Federal government ramps up research to manipulate the human brain and engineer DNA

COGSEC – The Ministry of Truth – by Spartacus 

Declassify and Ban Neuroweapons 

What is the impact of satellites covering the Earth with Radiation?

Defund and Exit the United Nations 

Depopulation is a UN Agenda 

 


Image source

 

JDfor2024.com

 


 

Categories
Biometric Surveillance Blog Environment

What is the impact of satellites covering the Earth with Radiation?

July 29, 2023 | What is the impact of satellites covering the Earth with Radiation? | Image source | Stop the Global Wi-Fi Assault

Yesterday SpaceX launched the Jupiter 3 communications satellite which is advertised to provide satellite internet to North and South America.

According to the Hughes Communications, “JUPITER 3 (EchoStar XXIV) is the highly anticipated, next generation Ultra High Density Satellite (UHDS) that will double the capacity of the Hughes JUPITER satellite fleet. Once launched, this powerful communications satellite will support in-flight Wi-Fimaritime connectionsenterprise networks, backhaul for Mobile Network Operators (MNOs), and Community Wi-Fi solutions, in addition to satellite internet connectivity across North and South America.”

Amazon also has an initiative to “deploy thousands of satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) linked to a global network of antennas, fiber, and internet connection points on the ground.” Bill Gates has invested in satellites and “5G” ground-based microwave tower and antenna infrastructure as well.

Some may wonder what’s involved in satellite communications “service” or Wi-Fi delivery from space.  Setting aside the skillful use of marketing terms such as “Wi-Fi,” “broadband,” and “connections,” what is actually being transmitted is Radiofrequency/Microwave (RF/MW) Radiation, a harmful physical agent.

What are the consequences of satellites covering the Earth with RF/MW Radiation?

When thinking of microwaves, we often think about the microwave oven, which operates at about the same frequency as wireless, or Wi-Fi, at 2.4 – 2.5 GHz.

Read: Why Everything Wireless Is 2.4 GHz | WIRED

The reason why 2.4 to 2.5 GHz is very problematic is that this frequency is a wavelength of about 5″, which is close to the dimensions of the human head and brain, as well as other organs. This means that radiation absorption is maximized in these organs. Further, because of maximized absorption, no exposure level is safe.

 

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms • ZERO5G

 

Did you know?  America’s first satellite program was called CORONA.

1960-CORONA: Americas First Satellite Program / Recent Satellite Systems

 

Did you know?   NOAA weather satellite systems were reportedly hacked by China in 2014

Satellite systems interact with ground-based microwave antenna infrastructures. People, plants, animals, bees, and all biological life are being exposed to increased levels of RF/MW Radiation ostensibly for phone and internet “service,” but satellites are also deployed as weaponry as well as for the total surveillance of every inch of the Earth.

Image source

 

Read:

Satellites can be used for weaponry and weather modification.

China launches 4 commercial weather satellites to orbit (video) | Space

China satellites for weather control

 

Link To Source HERE

In sum, rocket pollution, radiation, and space junk from satellite systems, as well as microwave weapons are not Earth friendly.

Strong safety regulation of satellite/ground-based microwave antenna infrastructures and public oversight are necessary to protect all life on Earth.


 

JUPITER 3 Next Generation Ultra High Density Satellite | Hughes

Link To Source HERE


Related

URGENT Action – OPPOSE The Digital Prison Act, H.R. 3557 

The Internet of Bodies

The case for space environmentalism | Nature Astronomy

Amazon Announces “SIDEWALK’ Wireless Network for IoT 

6G Wireless Systems

Fire Starters 

Congress moving forward on classified 6G wireless 

Live Starlink Satellite Map / Operation Starfall H.R. 5123 

How Geoengineering and “5G” are Linked 

5G / 26-GHz Graphene Transistor


JDfor2024.com

Categories
Biometric Surveillance Blog WEF

Addressing the Threat of Human Engineering

Image Source  |   JDfor2024.com

We were warned about the rise of unwarranted influence both sought and unsought by the military-industrial [intelligence-pharmaceutical-media] complex by President Eisenhower in 1961.

The military industry and billionaire “philanthropists” have partnered to control every aspect of the natural world including engineering of the food, medicine, and even the weather.  Human beings are another target of engineering.  The following article by Spartacus explores the globalist effort to re-engineer humanity.

We have seen how Schwab and other anti-human organizers of C19 are obsessed with controlling (and reducing) the world’s population.  The plan to enslave humanity through bio surveillance under the skin, a digital ID, vaxx passport, social credit system, QR codes, and central bank digital currency (CBDC), has not been a secret.

However, many people choose freedom and understand their ability to derail this scheme. There are many things we can all do to buck the system: using cash whenever we shop, powering off the cell phones and wi-fi, consciously unplugging from social media, reigning in the ‘smart’ grid with safety regulations, and connecting with others who share our values to work together at the local level to help enact better policies. Most important is the urgent need for public oversight and bioethics in technology.

 


By Spartacus

Link To Video HERE

Here’s the problem: he’s not wrong. People get pissed off when they hear statements like master of the world because they think it’s an empty threat; little more than the idle bluster of a megalomaniac. It most certainly isn’t. The reason why people don’t see what this technology is capable of is because, for one thing, they aren’t cursed with an overactive imagination, and for another, they aren’t used to holistic systems thinking, and lastly, there has been next to no mainstream media coverage of synthetic biologybecause if there was, people would rightly be having a conniption fit.

I’m going to ask you something that may strike you as a little bit strange. What is an internal organ? The textbook answer is something along the lines of specialized tissue in the body that performs a specific function. But what if I told you that an internal organ can be whatever the heck we want it to be?

RSC – A morphospace for synthetic organs and organoids: the possible and the actual

Efforts in evolutionary developmental biology have shed light on how organs are developed and why evolution has selected some structures instead of others. These advances in the understanding of organogenesis along with the most recent techniques of organotypic cultures, tissue bioprinting and synthetic biology provide the tools to hack the physical and genetic constraints in organ development, thus opening new avenues for research in the form of completely designed or merely altered settings. Here we propose a unifying framework that connects the concept of morphospace (i.e. the space of possible structures) with synthetic biology and tissue engineering. We aim for a synthesis that incorporates our understanding of both evolutionary and architectural constraints and can be used as a guide for exploring alternative design principles to build artificial organs and organoids. We present a three-dimensional morphospace incorporating three key features associated to organ and organoid complexity. The axes of this space include the degree of complexity introduced by developmental mechanisms required to build the structure, its potential to store and react to information and the underlying physical state. We suggest that a large fraction of this space is empty, and that the void might offer clues for alternative ways of designing and even inventing new organs.

What if the organs found in humans and animals – kidneys, spleen, liver, heart, brain, et cetera – do not represent all possible configurations of cells, but only the narrowly defined ones selected by evolution? What if there is a giant unexamined blank spot where you can have things like thinking muscle tissue chock-full of neurons, or an all-in-one liver and kidney (lidney?) right under your skin that makes you sweat filtered toxins out? What if we could manufacture entirely new organs from scratch that never existed in nature before and have completely novel functions? What if a guy could have little brains implanted in every joint in his body and give his arms and legs a mind of their own, like an octopus?

This is something that has been explored in science fiction numerous times, in the past. In Warhammer 40,000, the highly augmented and superhuman Space Marines are implanted with numerous scratch-built organs, and if you’ve ever read Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl or the late Greg Bear’s Blood Music, then you know exactly how bizarre this sort of thing can get. There’s just one problem, here, and it’s that this stuff is getting alarmingly close to not being science fiction anymore, and there are basically no ethical frameworks in place to make sure it isn’t horribly abused.

This is just one example of what you can do with synthetic biology. Another thing you can do is design completely new enzymes from scratch, insert the genes coding for them into bacteria, and use them as reagents to produce entirely new compounds.

Still not convinced? If you go on the Government of Canada’s website, right now, this is one of the articles they have up. I recommend archiving it.

Policy Horizons Canada – Exploring Biodigital Convergence

I wake up to the sunlight and salty coastal air of the Adriatic sea. I don’t live anywhere near the Mediterranean, but my AI, which is also my health advisor, has prescribed a specific air quality, scent, and solar intensity to manage my energy levels in the morning, and has programmed my bedroom to mimic this climate.

The fresh bed sheets grown in my building from regenerating fungi are better than I imagined; I feel rested and ready for the day. I need to check a few things before I get up. I send a brain message to open the app that controls my insulin levels and make sure my pancreas is optimally supported. I can’t imagine having to inject myself with needles like my mother did when she was a child. Now it’s a microbe transplant that auto adjusts and reports on my levels.

Everything looks all right, so I check my brain’s digital interface to read the dream data that was recorded and processed in real time last night. My therapy app analyzes the emotional responses I expressed while I slept. It suggests I take time to be in nature this week to reflect on my recurring trapped-in-a-box dream and enhance helpful subconscious neural activity. My AI recommends a “forest day”. I think “okay”, and my AI and neural implant do the rest.

I touched on this in the last Spartacast, but I don’t think I really got the point across. Biotech and information technology are completely intertwined, and they have been for decades, now. Anyone remember Folding@home, where people used their PlayStations to contribute processor power to a distributed supercomputer network?

That was back in 2007, and the actual software client itself has existed since 2000. They do everything on a computer, now. The whole idea behind mRNA vaccines is basically to digitize vaccines by reducing them to synthetic gene sequences and using human cells as bioreactors to make the actual protein, skipping over a bunch of manufacturing steps.

Okay, so you have CRISPR. You have DREADDs. You have nanotransducers. You have the ability to create engineered amyloids, like Ehud Gazit’s amyloid semiconductors. You have even more than that, too. A friend of mine on Twitter, C.M. (who currently goes by @CRISPR_Cas69), alerted me to a paper on implementing an entire von Neumann architecture in nothing but lipid nanoparticles:

Science Advances – Nanoparticle-based computing architecture for nanoparticle neural networks

The lack of a scalable nanoparticle-based computing architecture severely limits the potential and use of nanoparticles for manipulating and processing information with molecular computing schemes. Inspired by the von Neumann architecture (VNA), in which multiple programs can be operated without restructuring the computer, we realized the nanoparticle-based VNA (NVNA) on a lipid chip for multiple executions of arbitrary molecular logic operations in the single chip without refabrication. In this system, nanoparticles on a lipid chip function as the hardware that features memory, processors, and output units, and DNA strands are used as the software to provide molecular instructions for the facile programming of logic circuits. NVNA enables a group of nanoparticles to form a feed-forward neural network, a perceptron, which implements functionally complete Boolean logic operations, and provides a programmable, resettable, scalable computing architecture and circuit board to form nanoparticle neural networks and make logical decisions.

What happens if we integrate all of these disparate ideas together into a single platform? What could we create? Could we inject someone with a substance that generates wirelessly manipulated smart tissues in someone’s body? Think about it. Let’s say we use mRNA to produce Yamanaka factors in someone’s cells to turn them into stem cells in vivo, and then, let’s say we spliced new genes into those cells to generate an entirely new, synthetic cell line with entirely novel functionality. Then, let’s say these collections of cells were coaxed into performing specific tasks by manipulating their membrane potential with nanotransducers, or by using chemogenetics. What if these cells migrated throughout the body, divided, and formed colonies, like a symbiotic organism, all while evading the immune system by giving off signals identical to human cells? What if these cells could be made to secrete neurotransmitters or hormones into the extracellular space to manipulate the functions of the subject’s normal cells? What if they could be used to construct tissue scaffolds around the subject’s existing organs and manipulate or monitor their function, through extracellular matrix remodeling?

These are just a couple hypothetical examples. There are many more possible implementations, here, including using tissue engineering to make entirely new, 3D-printed “cybernetic” organs. Soldiers in the future might not wear gas masks at all. Why bother, when they’ve all been implanted with an organ that instantly secretes atropine the moment they get a whiff of VX, or when their acetylcholine receptors have been completely altered to resist binding by organophosphates? What if intelligence officers all had 200 IQ and perfect recall because their neural lace links their brains together into a hive mind with a bunch of printed brains in vats?

These sorts of questions, and many more, are being asked in top military think tanks in the US, Russia, and China. Nobody wants to lose strategic surprise by being the one country that didn’t make supermen in time for World War III. DARPA know that China’s track record for ethics is extremely poor, and that it’s likely that they’re engaging in human experimentation behind the scenes. That tempts our own leaders to do the same (and, indeed, they are).

That’s not all you can do with synthetic biology. Assassinations without the possibility for attribution, debilitating specific people by inducing chronic health issues, destroying enemy agriculture with novel plant pathogens, engineering scratch-made viruses and bacteria to produce hyper-lethal bioweapons, engineering obedience and docility into people by altering the balance of androgens and neurotransmitters in their bodies to blunt aggression and drive for reward, the list goes on and on.

When Klaus Schwab says that those who master these technologies will master the world, if anything, he is underselling it. With these technologies, you could re-engineer an entire species – including humans – into something completely different.

I cannot stress this enough. There needs to be a public conversation about synthetic biology and neurotechnology, right now, and there need to be policies enacted that strictly define international and binding limits for its use. If not, then the human beings of the future will inevitably be reduced to engineered products.

The people behind all of this are anti-personalists. They see no value in the person per se, the person itself. Only the collective good matters to them.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Personalism

Personalists regard personhood (or “personality”) as the fundamental notion, as that which gives meaning to all of reality and constitutes its supreme value. Personhood carries with it an inviolable dignity that merits unconditional respect. Personalism has for the most part not been primarily a theoretical philosophy of the person. Although it does defend a unique theoretical understanding of the person, this understanding is in itself such as to support the prioritization of practical or moral philosophy, while at the same time the moral experience of the person is such as to decisively determine the theoretical understanding. For personalists, a person combines subjectivity and objectivity, causal activity and receptivity, unicity and relation, identity and creativity. Stressing the moral nature of the person, or the person as the subject and object of free activity, personalism tends to focus on practical, moral action and ethical questions.

Human beings are regarded by the agents of the NWO as resource-hungry, tribalistic, and aggressive. Basically, an invasive nuisance species. All it would take is for one panel of bioethicists to decide, “Gee, civilization sure would be better if we engineered the capacity for crime, aggressive behavior, bigotry, and fanaticism out of humans.”

Then, before you know it, one day, people line up for their “vaccines”, and years later, they start having kids that are more carpenter ant than human, utterly incapable of personhood, of the intrinsically valuable experience of becoming a man or woman.

People still think this is just about a virus or a vaccine. It’s not. Much, much more than that is at stake, here. More than most can even fathom.

-Spartacus

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Categories
Biometric Surveillance Blog Cyber security

TSA Wants To Scan Your Face

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is rolling out facial recognition machines at 16 airports around the nation. Many people do not trust the technology so are choosing to opt out. Biometric surveillance and facial recognition technology is controversial and has already been banned in San Francisco based on civil rights and privacy issues. -JD

 


 

TSA Wants to Steal Your Face – You DO NOT Have to Let Them

December 9, 2022 | By

Facial scans planned to roll out nationwide and it WILL be a database (already is).

Link To Video

 


 

Link To Full Article HERE

 


 

Image Source