August 18, 2023 | Zero5G.com | Image source_Biological Effects Of RadioFrequency Radiation 1984
A 1978 Government Accounting Office (GAO) report on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) efforts to protect the public from exposure to low-level radiation was requested by New York Congressmember Elizabeth Holtzman, in August 1977.
The potential harmful health effects of low-level radiation were recognized and became a subject of national interest.
According to the 15 page report, symptoms attributed to low-level exposure to radiation include, “headache, weariness, dizziness, irritability, emotional instability, partial loss of memory, loss of appetite, cardiovascular effects, electroencephalogram changes, blood chemistry changes, changes in respiration, and possible genetic effects.”
Today there are zero agencies monitoring or measuring radiation to protect public health and environmental safety.
Despite the lack of a protective safety standard and the failure of government agencies to stop radiation, individuals and communities everywhere are organizing to establish strong regulatory barriers at the local level to stop radiation deployments, prevent harm, and protect all life.
Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency To Protect the Public from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures
“–the U.S. standard for extended human occupational exposure to microwave radiation is approximately 1,000 times greater than the Soviet Union’s published standard.” -p. 3
July 31, 2023 | Information warfare is not something that we often think of while scrolling through internet feeds and surfing online. However, each of us is now a target of psychological warfare, designed specifically for us according to our preferences based on our unique online history – to alter our perceptions and change our behaviors.
Dividing and conquering the population and getting people to lose their minds, is a primary objective of cognitive warfare.
A 2022 NATO report titled “Cognitive Warfare”: The Advent of the Concept of “Cognitics” in the Field of Warfare, states:
“Cognitive warfare is now with us. The main challenge is that it is essentially invisible; all you see is its impact, and by then … it is often too late…
It operates on a global stage since humankind as a whole is now digitally connected. It uses information technology and the tools, machines, networks, and systems that come with it. Its target is clear: our individual intelligences, to be considered both individually and as a group.”
We witnessed the success of cognitive warfare strategy achieved during the CV19 operation.
During the planned CV19 event, reasonable and rational people were fooled and coerced into collectivist compliance by means of government and social media propaganda. We were socially engineered to be terrified of an invisible enemy, that we later found out was just a bad flu made in a lab.
The foundation of cognitive warfare is built on wireless communications infrastructures [satellite networks and interoperable microwave antenna systems, aka “+4G+5G+6G+”] toward an overarching Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Counteracting cognitive warfare involves consciously unplugging ourselves from the internet and social media, continually questioning and scrutinizing information for accuracy, gaining local control of wireless infrastructures, while preferring and prioritizing wired connections to boost security.
Amazon also has an initiative to “deploy thousands of satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) linked to a global network of antennas, fiber, and internet connection points on the ground.” Bill Gates has invested in satellites and “5G” ground-based microwave tower and antenna infrastructure as well.
Some may wonder what’s involved in satellite communications “service” or Wi-Fi delivery from space. Setting aside the skillful use of marketing terms such as “Wi-Fi,” “broadband,” and “connections,” what is actually being transmitted is Radiofrequency/Microwave (RF/MW)Radiation, a harmful physical agent.
What are the consequences of satellites covering the Earth with RF/MW Radiation?
When thinking of microwaves, we often think about the microwave oven, which operates at about the same frequency as wireless, or Wi-Fi, at 2.4 – 2.5 GHz.
The reason why 2.4 to 2.5 GHz is very problematic is that this frequency is a wavelength of about 5″, which is close to the dimensions of the human head and brain, as well as other organs. This means that radiation absorption is maximized in these organs. Further, because of maximized absorption, no exposure level is safe.
Satellite systems interact with ground-based microwave antenna infrastructures. People, plants, animals, bees, and all biological life are being exposed to increased levels of RF/MW Radiation ostensibly for phone and internet “service,” but satellites are also deployed as weaponry as well as for the total surveillance of every inch of the Earth.
“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”-President Eisenhower, 1961
The White House has released a new report, “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlining the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research”.
The schemes involve the intentional release of chemical aerosols to block sunlight from reaching the Earth. The document acknowledges harmful potential consequences of deliberately contaminating the air, such as increased public exposure to particulate matter and toxic air pollution, psychological impacts, changes in the color of the sky, precipitation reduction, reduction of crop yields, and other “known unknowns.”
This report is an attempt seeking to legitimize geoengineering, a form of environmental warfare involvingdeliberate poisoning of the air and blocking the sunlight. The public does not consent to geoengineering.
Link To 2013 Video -Geoengineering-David-Keith: “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
The Biden administration continues to push dangerous and unproven technology, such as Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), by providing massive tax credits to CCS companies through the Inflation Reduction Act.
A 2,000-mile carbon capture pipeline is planned to be built through five states by Summit Carbon Solutions (SCS). The company has gone to court to try and seize property rights from over 80 South Dakota landowners because their land is located in the path of the pipeline.
A 2014 analysis of carbon capture, storage and utilization technologies states: “environmental impacts such as acidification and human toxicity are higher with than without CCS…”
As with the devastation to marine life from wind towers and destruction of the Earth through massive excavation and depletion of resources used in producing EV batteries, it is clear that politicians and their corporate lobbyist sponsors are not qualified to design energy efficient systems.