Categories
Blog

Biden_Obama Geoengineering Efforts; Paris Agreement Provisions for Geoengineering Governance

18 March 2010  |  United States Government Accountability Office

Today’s testimony focuses on GAO’s preliminary observations on (1) the state of the science regarding geoengineering approaches and their effects, (2) federal involvement in geoengineering activities, and (3) the views of experts and federal officials about the extent to which federal laws and international agreements apply to geoengineering.

 

Link To Report_Preliminary Observations on Geoengineering Science, Federal Efforts, and Governance Issues

 

 


 

 

A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts

Link

 


 

Many people have yet to understand the actual provisions for geoengineering via the Paris Agreement (UN Agenda 2030).
Thank you for helping to educate others on this urgent matter.
The Geoengineering Act is more important than ever before! JD

Biden_Obama Geoengineering
https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/124271.pdf
PubMed Solar Geoengineering Strategy
https://zerogeoengineering.com/2018/solar-geoengineering-as-part-of-an-overall-strategy-for-meeting-the-1-5c-paris-target/

THE PARIS AGREEMENT AND CLIMATE GEOENGINEERING GOVERNANCE:

https://zerogeoengineering.com/2016/paris-agreement-climate-geoengineering-governance/

Sulphur Aerosol Injection

Sulphur aerosol injection (SAI) is considered the most technologically feasible geoengineering option, and thus the most actively investigated currently.55  SAI seeks to enhance planetary albedo (surface reflectivity of the sun’s radiation) 56 through the injection of a gas such as sulphur dioxide or another gas that will ultimately react chemically in the stratosphere to form sulfate aerosols. Alternatively, this approach may be effectuated through direct injection of sulphuric acid.57″

Page 7
Soviet Military Origins of Climate Theory
https://zerogeoengineering.com/2018/soviet-developments-in-weather-modification-climate-modification-and-climatology/
Climate Engineering Under Paris Climate Agreement
https://zerogeoengineering.com/2019/climate-engineering-under-the-paris-agreement-a-legal-and-policy-primer/
The Geoengineering Act_SOLUTION
http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText20/HouseText20/H8062.pdf
Carter – Trump Weather Modification_Federal Weather Enterprise
https://jdfor2020.com/2020/09/how-jimmy-carters-1979-federal-weather-modification-efforts-evolved-into-barak-obamas-geoengineering-efforts-to-donald-trumps-2021-federal-weather-enterprise-history-budgets/
Rockefeller’s War on Humanity
https://jdfor2020.com/2020/10/rockefellers-war-on-humanity-un-agenda-21-the-new-world-order/
Bill Gates 5G_Geoengineering
https://jdfor2020.com/2020/12/re-5g-crown-castle-international-bill-gates-owns-this-hot-tech-stock/
Intersection of Geoengineering and 5G
https://zero5g.com/2019/measuring-urban-rainfall-using-microwave-links-from-commercial-cellular-communication-networks/

 

 

Categories
Blog

BIDEN 100 DAYS OF MASKING, MASK MANDATE?

January 20, 2021 | The Healthy American Peggy Hall |

“No president can make a law. There is no “mask mandate” that applies to you unless you work for the federal government. Even then, it can be appealed. That’s because you have the right to life, and life requires oxygen. It is unlawful for someone to restrict your oxygen against your will. Learn more about your rights and how to protect them here: www.thehealthyamerican.org

 

Link To Video     Bitchute

 

 


 

The Healthy American Peggy Hall with Tammy Clark

 

OSHA EXPERT TAMMY CLARK in discussion with Peggy Hall

Link To Video

 


 

 

THE HEALTHY AMERICAN® — About Vaccines

Link To Article

 

Categories
Blog

JD Shadow Citizen Interview

January 21, 2021 | 

Jolie Diane in conversation with Rachael L. McIntosh discussing ZERO party affiliation, 2020 lessons, solutionary ideas for the future, and more… Link To Video

 


 

Link To JD Communications Archive

 JDfor2024

#planesight

 

Categories
Blog

A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE RESEARCH ON BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION IN RUSSIA AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION

July 2011 | Authors: Andrei G. Pakhomov1,2 and Michael R. Murphy2 | ResearchGate | Source 

“The principal source of information is a personal collection of scientific publications in Russian, which was accumulated as a part of a 7-year effort of one of the authors (A.G.P.) to monitor and review the Russian/FSU research in the area of electromagnetic biology. Currently, this collection includes over 1200 titles and is one of the largest of its kind.

Over 1000 of the collected studies were abstracted in English, and the abstracts are included in the electronic EMF Database (produced and distributed by Information Ventures, Inc., PA, USA). This Database (v. 3.2.4, 1999), which is the second major source of information for the current review, contains about 26000 unique citations of studies on bioeffects of electromagnetic fields (from DC to mm-waves).”

 

 

 

“We conclude that Russian/FSU studies constitute an important source of information on pulsed RF bioeffects. Particular emphasis in these studies was given to RF-induced changes in the nervous system function..”

 

Link To Full Document_2000_pulse bioeffects review

 

 


 

 

EASTON BECOMES FIRST TOWN IN CONNECTICUT TO BAN 5G

Link

 


 

 

State of New Hampshire Final Report on Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology

Link

 


 

 

Link To Ten Steps To Reduce Wireless and Cell Phone Radiation In Your Home_Environmental Health Trust

 

Link To More Scientific Research Radiofrequency / Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR)_Bio-effects

 

Link To ZERO5G.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Blog

The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society

January 21, 2021 | By Dr. Pascal Sacré | Global Research |

“Introduction: using a technique to lock down society

All current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious, true and no longer questioned:

Positive RT-PCR test means being sick with COVID. This assumption is misleading.

Very few people, including doctors, understand how a PCR test works.

RT-PCR means Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction.

In French, it means: Réaction de Polymérisation en Chaîne en Temps Réel.

In medicine, we use this tool mainly to diagnose a viral infection.

Starting from a clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a patient, we consider different diagnoses based on tests.

In the case of certain infections, particularly viral infections, we use the RT-PCR technique to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical picture.

We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an inflammatory syndrome!

It is a laboratory, molecular biology technique of gene amplification because it looks for gene traces (DNA or RNA) by amplifying them.

In addition to medicine, other fields of application are genetics, research, industry and forensics.

The technique is carried out in a specialized laboratory, it cannot be done in any laboratory, even a hospital. This entails a certain cost, and a delay sometimes of several days between the sample and the result.

Today, since the emergence of the new disease called COVID-19 (COrona VIrus Disease-2019), the RT-PCR diagnostic technique is used to define positive cases, confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus responsible for the new acute respiratory distress syndrome called COVID-19).

These positive cases are assimilated to COVID-19 cases, some of whom are hospitalized or even admitted to intensive care units.

Official postulate of our managers: positive RT-PCR cases = COVID-19 patients. [1]

This is the starting postulate, the premise of all official propaganda, which justifies all restrictive government measures: isolation, confinement, quarantine, mandatory masks, color codes by country and travel bans, tracking, social distances in companies, stores and even, even more importantly, in schools [2].

This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.

Technical aspects: to better understand and not be manipulated

The PCR technique was developed by chemist Kary B. Mullis in 1986. Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.

Although this is disputed [3], Kary Mullis himself is said to have criticized the interest of PCR as a diagnostic tool for an infection, especially a viral one.

He stated that if PCR was a good tool for research, it was a very bad tool in medicine, in the clinic [4].”

 

Link To Read Full Article @ Source