July 2, 2023 |ZeroGeoengineering.com | JDfor2024.com
“Public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”-President Eisenhower, 1961
The White House has released a new report, “Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management,” outlining the plan to deploy geoengineering programs, that are being framed as “research”.
The schemes involve the intentional release of chemical aerosols to block sunlight from reaching the Earth. The document acknowledges harmful potential consequences of deliberately contaminating the air, such as increased public exposure to particulate matter and toxic air pollution, psychological impacts, changes in the color of the sky, precipitation reduction, reduction of crop yields, and other “known unknowns.”
The proposal is not new, it actually reiterates other programs for geoengineering “research” such as Obama-Biden’s 2010 “A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts” and “Preliminary Observations on Geoengineering Science, Federal Efforts, and Governance Issues.”
Trump’s Geoengineering program was called The Federal Weather Enterprise. (Weather and climate engineering history follows a continuum, regardless of political party).
Additionally, the report calls for international cooperation and governance via the United Nations (UN) World Meteorology Organization (WMO), an agency that is already engaged in “research of atmospheric aerosol dispersion.”
This report is an attempt seeking to legitimize geoengineering, a form of environmental warfare involving deliberate poisoning of the air and blocking the sunlight. The public does not consent to geoengineering.
Link To 2013 Video -Geoengineering-David-Keith: “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”
Congressionally Mandated Research Plan and an Initial Research Governance Framework Related to Solar Radiation Management (whitehouse.gov)
Link To Full Document Congressionally-Mandated-Report-on-Solar-Radiation-Modification June 2023
Role of USGCRP in Climate Data Provision
NSF FY 2020 Budget USGCRP
The U.S. Global Change Research Program 2022-2031 Strategic Plan_USGCRP_2022-2031_Decadal_Strategic_Plan
Meteorology, Climate Control, and Rebranding The Federal Weather Enterprise • Zero Geoengineering
Geoengineering Parts I, II, and III
Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy
A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts
Preliminary Observations on Geoengineering Science, Federal Efforts, and Governance Issues
Weather and Climate Modification
Solar Geoengineering 2023 CRS
National Weather Modification Policies and Programs
DARPA-DOD Funding for Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Scenarios
DOD Management Issues Related to Chaff
Are Directed Energy Weapons and Geoengineering Triggering Explosive Fires?
Forest Fire As A Military Weapon
Ways to Address Reckless Government Spending
Laws Needed to Protect Against UN “Governance” of Geoengineering • Zero Geoengineering
World Economic Forum Parrots SAI Geoengineering Strategies • Zero Geoengineering
Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia provide precedent from the 1960’s for prohibiting cloud seeding and weather modification. These kinds of policies could be reenacted at the state and national level today.
Research the Atmosphere Protection Act
Take Action HERE
To learn more about advocating for legislation to prohibit solar radiation modification, geoengineering, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org.