August 18, 2023 | Zero5G.com | Image source_Biological Effects Of RadioFrequency Radiation 1984
A 1978 Government Accounting Office (GAO) report on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) efforts to protect the public from exposure to low-level radiation was requested by New York Congressmember Elizabeth Holtzman, in August 1977.
The potential harmful health effects of low-level radiation were recognized and became a subject of national interest.
According to the 15 page report, symptoms attributed to low-level exposure to radiation include, “headache, weariness, dizziness, irritability, emotional instability, partial loss of memory, loss of appetite, cardiovascular effects, electroencephalogram changes, blood chemistry changes, changes in respiration, and possible genetic effects.”
Today there are zero agencies monitoring or measuring radiation to protect public health and environmental safety.
Despite the lack of a protective safety standard and the failure of government agencies to stop radiation, individuals and communities everywhere are organizing to establish strong regulatory barriers at the local level to stop radiation deployments, prevent harm, and protect all life.
Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency To Protect the Public from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures
“–the U.S. standard for extended human occupational exposure to microwave radiation is approximately 1,000 times greater than the Soviet Union’s published standard.” -p. 3
Electromagnetic (Em) weaponry is an important capability of telecommunications systems that has been largely ignored.
Many are aware that when powered on, “smart” devices are continuously transmitting and receiving pulse-modulated, radiofrequency/microwave (RF/MW) radiation, a harmful physical agent. However, many have yet to consider the impact of irradiating infrastructure (aka, “+4G-5G-6G+”) that is contaminating our environment and exposing people and nature to this hazardous pollution 24/7/365.
Slow motion animation: near-field chaos and far-field radiation from a dipole antenna Source: Scientists4WiredTech
The article below, written in 2005, describes research by military intelligence agencies to develop electromagnetic weapons for mind control and anti-personnel war capabilities.
The full document is available for purchase here, while a synopsis of the topic by author David Guyatt, can be read here.
GUYATT, DAVID. “Anti-Personnel ‘Soft-Kill’ Em Weaponry.” World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, vol. 9, no. 4, 2005, pp. 41–57. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/48531829.|
Abstract
“Since World War II at least, the world’s leading powers, especially the USSR and the USA have invested considerable resources in R&D of a variety of electro-magnetic and other mind control techniques, meant to both defeat enemies in a war and modify the behaviour of individuals and social groups, presumably in order to secure submission to the established authorities.”
*Research related to the potential to induce illness by altering the magnetic nature of geography, is briefly referenced in the synopsis.
*The concept of potential disease activation via RF/MW radiation warrants close examination, especially with regard to the CV19 event*
With the massive rollout of unmonitored microwave antennas and irradiating infrastructure (“4G-5G-6G”), the impact of increased exposure to microwave radiation is an important component in the equation for human health:
1.) Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases_Link
2.) Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G_Link
3.) Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms. Link
Understanding the weaponry potential of microwave towers and antenna systems is critical in stopping harm to people and nature.
Safety regulations are urgently needed to tackle these hazardous and potentially lethal systems.
“Former DARPA Senior Scientist, Dr. Paul Batcho, asserts that cell phone towers pose an intentional and immediate lethal threat against the general public of the United States.
Batcho states that – they are purposely engaging in “acts of terrorism” against the general public through emission of dangerous frequencies from cell phone and microwave towers.”
Finally, the 1980 MindWar document by Colonel Paul Valley and Major Michael Aquino states, “…this weapons system uses existing communications media. It seeks to map the minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then to change them in accordance with U.S. national interests. It does this on a wide scale, embracing military units, regions, nations, and blocs. In its present form it is called Psychological Operations (PSYOP).”
“Atmospheric EM activity is regularly altered by such phenomena as sunspot eruptions and gravitational stresses which distort the Earth’s magnetic field. Under varying external EM conditions, humans are more or less disposed to the consideration of new ideas. MindWar should be timed accordingly.”
Image: 5G tower at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City. Photo credit: AD
Zero5G.com | Who is monitoring and measuring MICROWAVE RADIATION?
A recent article in the New York Times citing “mysterious towers looming over New York’s sidewalks” has drawn much needed attention to the problem of reckless deployment of polluting wireless irradiating antennas, being marketed as “5G”.
What is unknown to most cell phone users, is that in addition to the advertised “faster downloads,” other purposes of “4G-5G-6G” may include, unwarranted biometric surveillance and data collection, track and trace, vaxx surveillance with interactive capabilities, digital currency, digital ID, weather modification, weaponry aspects, and other globalist, technocratic intrusions.
The Link5G cell towers shown above and other microwave towers and antennas are designed to transmit and receive pulsed, data-modulated Radiofrequency/MICROWAVE RADIATION(RF/MWR). 12-13-2021_Link5G-PDF
“MICROWAVE RADIATION” is a term that the telecommunications industry does not want the public to talk about or understand.
“5G” is Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR), a hazardous, xenobiotic (foreign-to-life) physical agent, that is also used by the military and police as a weapon. The idea that the adverse bio-effects and harms of MICROWAVE RADIATION are not known, is false.
Well documented in tens of thousands of scientific studies are significant adverse bio-effects including neurological disorders, blood clotting, cardiomyopathy, DNA damage, diabetes, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, sleep disruption, sperm damage, even at very low levels of RF/MWR exposure.
Additionally, acute radiation sickness “is just exactly like a terrible flu,” according to Colonel L. AndrewHuff, Director Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute National Naval Medical Center.
Link ToRadiofrequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation Exposures
5G is likely to prove to be an ecological disaster without essential local public oversight and safety regulations to immediately reduce and eliminate harmful RF/MWR pollution.
The map below provides an unverified estimate of how many microwave towers and antennas are located within a 3 mile radius of the recently deployed “5G” jumbo tower located at Bayard Street and Mulberry Street in New York City.
According to antennasearch.com, there are 680 microwave towers and 9688 microwave antennas within a 3 mile radius of this location.
RF Readings taken at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street, New York City on November 10, 2022:
Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MWR) detected at Mulberry Street and Bayard Street in NYC. Photo credit: AD
Peak RF: 27,960 µW/m² > 1,000 = Extreme Hazard
Peak Volts per Meter 37 V/m >10 = Extreme Hazard
Peak Magnetic Field 49.4 Milligauss mG>5 = Extreme Hazard
Question: Is the jumbo 5G tower on?
Answer: RF/MWR levels at this location are already in the extreme hazard range, so if the tower is not operating now, the addition of the jumbo 5G tower will be far more hazardous.
Link ToBiologically-Based RF Microwave Radiation Exposure Guidelines
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G
The UN ITU role of globally standardizing “5G” underscores a key governance flaw: Rather than following the Constitution by protecting the rights (and safety) of individuals, many public officials have been led to believe that the FCC, UN ITU, and industry guidelines trump local oversight and control.
This error was addressed by a Federal Judge in New York on July 29, 2022 in the case of Extenet Systems Inc. v. The Village of Flower Hill. In a far reaching decision, the Court reaffirmed the power preserved to State and local governments by the United States Congress (47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(A)) entitled “general authority,” to regulate placement, construction, siting, and maintenance of cell towers and wireless facilities within their respective jurisdictions.
Now is the time for individuals in their local and state jurisdictions to step up together and prioritize public health and safety by controlling and regulating operations of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (WTFs).
Examples of USA communities and jurisdictions that have stopped 5G, prevented cell towers or addressed the RF/MWR crisis:
“5G” marketing is so skillful, that many people are under the false impression that this “product” is mainly about improving their cell phone “services.” What is not mentioned in slick advertising campaigns, is that “5G,” and ALL THE “G’s,” are actually MICROWAVE RADIATION pollution, that is transmitted by antenna systems 24/7/365.
MICROWAVE RADIATION is a hazardous physical agent that is harmful to human beings, our environment, and all life on Earth. Even devout environmentalists may not have considered the consequences of contaminating our environment with MICROWAVE RADIATION and continuous exposure to this hazardous agent.
Advertising is powerful and clever so as to emphasize certain “positive” aspects and hide negatives. So it is with the Internet of Things, or the IoT, made up of a combination of “5G” and other antenna and satellite systems to connect EVERYTHING to the internet. Those that have been paying attention understand this as total surveillance and potential control via biometrics, blockchain, and monitoring under the skin. Even beyond the IoT, is the Internet of Bodies or the IoB.
While mainstream media continuously promotes distractions from matters of greatest urgency, recently the U.S. Department of Commerce “has appointed 16 experts for the new Internet of Things Advisory Board (IoTAB), to advise the Internet of Things Federal Working Group.” The announcement describes the board as stakeholders outside the federal government who are experts in the IoT. Additionally, the U.S. Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless.
One may wonder why all the secrecy if the genuine goal is simply for everyone to have faster speeds and more services for cell phones? Turns out that the IoT( and the IoB ) looks very much like Russia’s new “Safe Cities” and China’s surveillance state.
In the USA, the 4th Amendment of our Constitution guarantees the right to be free from unwarranted surveillance and unreasonable searches and seizures. More and more towns and counties around the USA are preventing the reckless deployment of these de facto weapons systems.
5G and the IoT are not what they are being advertised to be.
Congress is moving forward on classified 6G wireless communications systems, even though microwave irradiating infrastructures (+4G-5G-6G) are opposed by communities around the nation and worldwide, due to their hazardous pollution emissions continuously contaminating the environment, and the built-in, unwarranted surveillance capabilities.
According to microwave weapons expert Barrie Trower, 5G and wireless radiation constitutes weaponry. LINK
More and more communities are putting the brakes on these harmful antenna systems.LINK
A recentstudy by The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), entitled “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G,” confirmed that FCC and ICNIRP guidelines, set in the 1990’s are not protective of human health or the environment and need to be updated.
The federal government 6G push is led by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). These agencies are in fact members of the UN International Telecommunications Union (UN ITU).
“The federal government should continue to support private, robust networks built on consensus-based global standards driven by the private sector and aggressively remove local barriers to deployment.” p.9
