Categories
Blog Environment Geoengineering /Weather modification Law / Litigation National Security War White House ZEROGeoENGINEERING

NSF Funding Sulfate Aerosol Injection 2023

November 25, 2022 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | National Science Foundation (NSF)

At a 2013 Geoengineering debate, Harvard professor David Keith admitted that sulfate aerosol injection is likely to kill tens of thousands of people when he stated,“So if I made a decision, or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

Keith remarked that he and his colleague Alan Robock (who was also on the debate panel ) have different views relative to the moral hazard of making a decision to do “research” that directly kills people. Link to_Full Video

Regardless, Robock, Keith, and other grant-dependent academics receive MILLIONS of dollars in funding for sulfate aerosol injection “research” also known as geoengineering.

On October 13th of this year, the White House announced the plan to push ahead with sulfate aerosol injection, in spite of the moral hazard and harm to be caused to human health and the environment, potentially on a global scale.

It’s entirely possible that other biological hazards could be released and extreme weather events could be engineered. The announcement underscores the urgency for strong public opposition, demanding an immediate halt to aerosol injection activities. Criminalizing atmospheric testing, with provisions for enforcement to include severe penalties, has precedent and is essential NOW, in order to protect human health, nature, and our environment.

 

Every USA State could adapt The Clean Atmosphere Act model to outlaw Geoengineering:

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText22/HouseText22/H7787.pdf


 

Link To National Science Foundation Awards Stratospheric Aerosol Injection 

 

NSF Rutgers 2020-2023

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2017113

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2028541

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2028541&HistoricalAwards=false

 

 

Colorado 2018-2023

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1745008&HistoricalAwards=false

 

 

Columbia New York 2021-2023

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2129627&HistoricalAwards=false

 

 

University of Wyoming Continuing Grant 2010-2016

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1011827

 

 

NSF Research in all 50 states

https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=111467

 

 

Link To Source

 

 


 

 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

White House Promotes Environmental Warfare SO2 Aerosol Injection

LINK

 


 

Categories
Alphabet Agencies Blog Corruption Crime Geoengineering /Weather modification ZEROGeoENGINEERING

1980 NASA: Changing the Climate With Aerosol Modification

 ZEROGeoengineering.com |

1980 NASA document provides a detailed description of a Stratospheric Aerosol Modification program designed to release tons of Sulfur Dioxide and other hazardous emissions into the atmosphere with the intention of changing the climate.

NASA and collaborating agencies CIA and DOD lack critical public oversight and scrutiny which is one reason why Geoengineering [environmental warfare] has occurred for decades and continues with zero regulations.

The White House recently announced funding for Sulfur Aerosol Injection programs for the next 5 years.  -JD

 


 

NASA 1980

Stratospheric Aerosol Modification by Supersonic Transport Operations With Climate Implications

 

Link To Full Document_Stratospheric Aerosol Modification_1980_NASA

 


NASA Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

LINK


 

Link To_CIA Director John O. Brennan speaks at Council on Foreign Relations meeting about Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI).

June 29, 2016

Link To Video

 

Link To_1960 CIA Climate Control


 

 

“So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision.”   Link To_ David Keith_2013

Link To Video  Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 

 


 

 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering, email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 

 


 

Categories
Biowarfare Blog Geoengineering /Weather modification War Zero5G ZEROGeoENGINEERING

HAARP RF Radiation “Experiments” Underway

Image Source | October 21, 2022 | ZEROGeoEngineering.com  | UAF Geophysical Institute

The University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), operating under an agreement with the Air Force, has started 13 new “experiments” radiating the upper atmosphere and ionosphere with up to 3.6 megawatts of power. The Air Force originally developed and owned HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) but transferred the facility to UAF in August 2015. The program is made possible by a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), one of the original drivers of Weather and Climate Modification in 1965.

These experiments are another example of the lack of meaningful ethical and moral standards in technology. For example, what are the environmental and human health bio-effects of HAARP deploying massive amounts of (PULSED) Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation (RF/MW)? Questions such as this are  absent from the “scientific” discussion regarding the pollution footprint created by these reckless “experiments”.

While HAARP may be new to many, research of this kind has been ongoing and explored by militaries as game-changing weaponry, especially since the brain is the battlefield of modern warfare.

A 1975 DARPA report titled, SOVIET DEVELOPMENTS IN WEATHER MODIFICATION, CLIMATE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATOLOGY stated:

“The Institute for the Study of the Brain (sic) of the University of California is cited as engaged in research on the debilitating effect of weak vibrational fields on human behavior.” -p.85

Bioethics in technology is urgently needed to reign in systems and programs which have the potential to harm and destroy life on Earth. -JD


 

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALTERING A REGION IN THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE, IONOSPHERE, AND/OR MAGNETOSPHERE __LINK 

2021_Geoengineering: NSF $9.3 Million Funds HAARP in Gakona, Alaska__LINK

HAARP Weather Control__LINK

Holes In Heaven__LINK

 

 


 

Neuroscientist Dr James Giordano. Neuro-Weapons. Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Brain Implants.

Presenting developments in the field of ‘Neuro-Weapons’. ‘The Brain is the Battlefield of the Future’ on 09/25/18 at the Modern War Institute, United States Military Academy West Point.

Link To Video

 

The Brain Is The Battlefield For The Future_LINK

McCain Conference 2022: Brain Computer Interface__LINK


 

Link To  5G and the Realities of Neuroweapons

 

 

 


 

From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory__LINK

 

 


 

Microwave Emissions and the Problem of Modern Viral Diseases.__LINK

 

 


 

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G.__LINK

 

 


 

 

Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms.__LINK

 

 


 

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G__LINK

 


 

Technology Convergence 2035:Humanity vs. AI__LINK

 


 

To learn more about advocating for a ban on atmospheric testing, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com

 


 

Categories
Blog Corruption Crime Geoengineering /Weather modification National Security ZEROGeoENGINEERING

FLASHBACK 2013: Harvard Professor Admits The Truth About Geoengineering

October 17, 2022 | ZEROGeoENGINEERING | Harvard_Geoengineering Budget _SG_Funding_Chart_2008-2018_Updated_Aug_2019 | Image Source Youtube Screenshot |

In light of the recent announcement by the White House that the Biden administration will be moving forward to fund and coordinate Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), it’s important that the public fully understand the criminality of these activities and reject these environmental warfare programs. Legitimate government requires the consent of the governed. Without informed public consent, such radical interventions qualify as assault and warfare.

In a 2013 debate on the topic, Harvard professor David Keith stated, “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”

In spite of false claims that these programs are new, the fact is, that every U.S. administration since President Johnson has pursued cloud-seeding and other forms of weather and climate modification. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is the world’s leader in orchestrating these destructive atmospheric activities, with 193 nations participating. The programs operate outside legitimate Constitutional governance.

Over 70 years of deliberate intervention in the Earth’s weather is causing significant damage and weather extremes.

It’s time to ban Geoengineering and other harmful atmospheric polluting activities. To learn more about advocating for a ban on Geoengineering and other atmospheric hazards, please email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

 


 

August 7, 2013 Geoengineering Debate MIT

Speakers: Oliver Morton, Alan Robock, Daniel Schrag, David Keith, and Stephen Gardiner

 

Link To Video

 

“This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year, let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision. I think that has moral consequences, I don’t sweep that under the rug. This is a case where I take this much differently from Alan and think it’s a much more serious issue. Now, it’s true that part of doing that, you would hope that the overall benefits of human mortality would be so that you would save many many more people than that. But the fact that you uh, would save more people than you kill, doesn’t mean there’s no moral impact (laughs) of making a decision that directly kills people. And I think that we who talk about this have a duty to be clear-eyed about the direct risks involved in doing it.”   -David Keith @ 1:10:15

 

Link To Video Clip_2013 Geoengineering David Keith_@1:10:15

Image Source_Youtube Screenshot

 


 

David Keith Presents Solar Geoengineering Lectures

LINK